Rough Guide to Flicker-Free HD Shooting
Shoot safely at 23.98p with these few simple, but crucial, tips
By Art Adams | October 26, 2009

The most common HD frame rate is a 50-year-old byproduct of the invention of color TV. And it's not a flicker-free safe speed.
Watch the video clip below to see why you should care...
This clip was shot on a RED ONE in order to illustrate the difference between flicker on a global shutter camera vs. a rolling shutter camera. Heres what to look for in the video clip:
-Flicker at 24p appears in certain parts of the frame and remains stationary.
-Flicker at 23.98 rolls upward through the frame as the period the shutter is closed is slightly longer than it is open. (More on that below.)
-The flicker "roll bars" get wider as the exposure time lengthens.
-The only truly safe shutter speeds divide evenly into 60; in this case they are 1/60th and 1/30th.
-Flicker reveals itself in a histogram as horizontal expansion and contraction.
After being bitten recently by flickering HMIs fed by old magnetic ballasts, I set out to learn why flicker happens and how to definitively get rid of it. One Tuesday afternoon I met Adam Wilt in his office at Meets The Eye Productions, and we searched the building for a truly awful fluorescent light. His desk lamp proved most offensive, with a visibly unstable magnetic ballast, so we shot the above tests to see when flicker happened... and when it didn't.
First, though, a word about NTSC and how it created the massive flickering headache we now enjoy:
While our power mains operate at a line frequency of 60hz, our television signals don't. One of the issues in the development of NTSC color television was preventing the color subcarrier from interfering with the audio signal. The solution required changing the video frequency to 59.94hz from 60hz. (Click here for the long version, complete with math.)
Our most common HD frame rate, 23.98p, has its roots in that decision. Early cameras, such as the Sony F900, offered a diverse series of frame rates, several of which (24p and 30p) proved nearly useless. The 24p option was intended only for film output, but as most film projects live on via broadcast television and DVD, both of which operate at 59.94hz in the U.S., it is often easier to simply shoot 23.98p and increase the frame rate slightly for film output. This is not always the case, as a number of film-destined productions have opted for true 24p, but 23.98p is the more common choice. 30p has proven popular for projects destined only for presentation on the web. Those six extra frames make life easier for graphic designers and animators, who can more easily avoid annoying strobe effects by using a faster frame rate.
Some cameras hide 23.98p behind a 24p setting, apparently to avoid confusion. For example, the Panasonic Varicam 27F/27H cameras don't offer a 23.98p option, only 24p; but as the camera's system clock normally operates at 59.94hz, 24p is actually 23.98p. In order to attain true 24p the system clock must be changed in the menus to 60hz.
Cameras currently on offer in the U.S. offer, at minimum, the same three standard frame rates: 23.98p, 29.97p, and 59.94i. None of these are flicker-free safe speeds.
Here's a graph of a sine wave:

This represents three cycles, or hertz, of alternating current, with each cycle containing one positive (above the line) and one negative (below the line) peak. To an HMI or other gas discharge lamp, this represents six pulses of light. Gas discharge lamps emit light pulses every time the sine wave peaks--even when the peak is negative (below the center line). All such lights incorporate a ballast, and one of the ballast's functions is to rectify the AC power and convert it into constant voltage DC power.
For those of us who know enough about electricity to plug in a lamp but not so much that we can avoid the occasional painful shock, the upshot of rectification is that the negative portions of the sine wave are converted to positive values:

Every one of these peaks indicates a full-strength light pulse, with the left side of the peak being the ignition part of the cycle (where the electrical charge builds and stimulates the gasses in the lamp to full brightness) and the quench part of the cycle (where the power dissipates and the gas's luminosity fades). In theory every peak is the same, as is the trough (the valley between the peaks), but Adam tells me that is occasionally not the case with fluorescent lights (and may not be with HMIs) using magnetic ballasts:

Not only can one peak in the cycle be dimmer than the other, but the troughs between peaks can vary as well. The gasses in the lamp don't completely extinguish between pulses, which means that not only can the peaks vary in brightness but the troughs can vary in darkness.
Most film cameras incorporate an optional 144-degree shutter for use with discharge light sources. Before the advent of square wave and flicker free ballasts the 144-degree shutter offered the safest way to avoid flicker. The standard speed for film cameras is 24fps: 120 pulses divided by 24 fps yields 5 pulses, of which 2.5 are seen with a 180-degree shutter. In theory that frame rate should be perfectly flicker free, as every frame receives the same number of light pulses... but it isn't. Depending on when the camera starts rolling that extra half cycle can appear anywhere in the sine wave, meaning that this extra half cycle could extend from peak to peak, trough to trough, or somewhere in between, resulting in differing exposures from shot to shot. Worse, if the speed of the camera and the frequency of the power grid are out of sync at all, flicker would appear very quickly as some of the frames see slightly more or slightly less than a half cycle.
And if the light is poorly rectified, resulting in unequal peaks and troughs, flicker is evident immediately: while one frame might see a normal peak, a reduced peak, and half of another normal peak, the next frame might see a reduced peak, a normal peak, and half of another reduced peak.
Setting the shutter at 144 degrees means that every frame sees exactly two light pulses, period. No matter where the sine wave is when the camera comes up to speed, every frame will receive the same amount of light as long as the camera runs at a true 24 fps and the power grid or generator maintains the power frequency at 60hz. Regardless of how well the negative peak is rectified, each frame will always see a total of one normal peak and one rectified peak.
If the camera speed or mains frequency drifts slightly, the odds are much better that the lack of sync between camera and power frequency will remain hidden at 1/60th of a second, whereas it will show up very quickly at 1/48th as the extra half cycle will appear at a different place in the power cycle with each exposed frame.
Now we enter the realm of modern HD cameras. In the U.S. and other NTSC/60hz countries, we live in a world where 23.98p is the magic number for broadcast and DVD media. Applying a 2/3 pulldown results in proper 59.94i broadcast-ready media, and more media is broadcast or distributed on DVD than ever appears projected on film.
But 23.98p is not a safe frequency for use with gas discharge lamps, especially with a 180-degree shutter. A 1/48th open shutter at 24p is followed by a 1/48th closed shutter, while a 1/48th open shutter at 23.98p is followed by a 1/47.96th closed shutter! While both exposures are technically the same,
The 24p exposure always sees the same number of both rectified and non-rectified peaks and troughs, at the same time in every frame, with the extra half cycle appearing at the same part of the cycle every time; whereas the 23.98p exposure drifts in time across different combinations of rectified and non-rectified peaks and troughs, with the half cycle appearing at a different time of the cycle in every frame.
This shows the difference in shutter speeds between 24p and 23.98p, with a 1/48th shutter dictating how long the shutter is open:

Shooting at 23.98 with a 180-degree shutter should work well with flicker-free or square-wave ballasts, which are specifically designed not to cause flicker, but if there's even one magnetic ballast in use, or any discharge sources in the shot with aging or bad ballasts (such as practical fluorescents in a ceiling), all bets are off.
There's a significant difference between how flicker manifests itself in global shutter cameras versus rolling shutter cameras. Global shutters tend to display flicker as an overall brightening and darkening of the affected area, while rolling shutters tend to see flicker in horizontal bars that remain stationary at 24p but that roll slowly up the frame at 23.98p. The vertical width of the horizontal strips is affected by the shutter speed: longer shutter speeds tend to make these bars wider and fainter, making them hard to spot on location or in a viewfinder.
This kind of flicker can appear as a slow "rolling" motion on a waveform monitor. Below is a clip from a short film I recently shot on a RED ONE camera. During this shot an HMI started to flicker visibly, and we took it out of commission immediately after this take. Bars can be seen rolling up the image, although we were fortunate in that they were faint enough that they weren't terribly distracting on playback. But it's easy to see the bars on a waveform monitor:
Share This
Get articles like this in your inbox: Sign Up
Comments
Twitter Feed
-
editblog - Tue, May 21 2013 - 3:51 pm
@veloeditor @comebackshane those were once real things!! -
artadams - Tue, May 21 2013 - 3:11 pm
Just another day at the office... http://t.co/nHMvSUyPVD







Graham Futerfas: | October, 27, 2009
Interesting. Thanks Art. A few days ago, I had a RED in an office environment that our Art Dept. built. They had a couple of iMac screens in the shot, and we were shooting 23.98. The screens had flicker, so I went to a 1/50th exposure, and it went away. I tried to phase and synchro them out at 1/60, but to no avail. I didn’t notice any flicker from the overhead fluoros (which we had put daylight tubes into), but if you scrub through that footage in high speed, it definitely has roll-bars. Tough choice… flicker in the LCD screen, or flicker in the fluoros. Fortunately, the roll bars aren’t really noticeable in the overheads, and my key and backlights were Kinos and HMI’s in flicker free. I shot most of the movie at 144-degree, I think in Normal shutter mode. Good to know the difference between normalabsolute and relative.
Thanks!
-Graham
Bill Burke: | October, 29, 2009
Art, thanks for the education on absolute and relative, time to change my film set mind in this instance.
stasic_001: | October, 31, 2009
Thank you very much for the info Art. Very helpful. Just one question:
“(2) The only truly safe flicker-free shutter speeds for 23.98p shooting are fractions whose denominator divides evenly into 60hz: 1/60, 1/30, 1/20, 1/15, etc. This guarantees the same number of cycles will be seen in every frame, negating the need for the camera and power frequencies to be perfectly in sync”
What about if you shoot 29.98p? Would we need to set the shutter speed at the fractions whose denominator divides evenly into 60Hz as well? Or there is some other math involved?
Thank you in advance.
Stan.
Art Adams: | October, 31, 2009
You could shoot at a 180-degree relative shutter at 30p exactly; otherwise, at 29.97p, the same rules apply: absolute shutter at 1/60th is best.
chrisoben: | August, 03, 2010
Art,
Excellent, elegant, well illustrated example of the ‘flicker issues’ we all should be aware of . . .
Question: What is the safe, absolute shutter speed for shooting 29.97 (with an EX1/3) under 50Hz lighting. Is it simply 1/100th of a second?
We will be hiring a UK team to acuire footage in the UK for North American release.
Thanks for your awesome advice!
Chris Oben - Cinematographer www.chrisoben.com
Please login or register to comment