NAB Show is:

Knowledge Partner

(Page 1 of 1 pages for this article )

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Filed under: NAB 2010NAB 2010 Real TimePost Production

Blackmagic Design takes DaVinci into brand new territory

Scott Simmons | 04/15

I don’t think anyone expected Blackmagic’s DaVinci news

DaVinci Resolve Mac panel

By now you’ve probably heard that at NAB 2010 Blackmagic has introduced a new product and a new strategy for their recently acquired DaVinci line of products. It’s really not much of a line at all anymore as it’s just Resolve and Revival. And it’s big, big news for Resolve.

If you’ve got a 2K Plus or a Splice then your product is at the end of its life. You might still get support for those existing products but there are no more DaVinci service contracts to be had for those products nor will they, according to the Blackmagic folks on the NAB show floor, ever be updated again. But that’s okay since the industry standard color grading system, the DaVinci Resolve, can now be had at an unbelievable price. Keep in mind that these are systems that were in the 6-figure range just a short time ago.

DaVinci Resolve software price

Now that DaVinci power is “affordable.” Blackmagic introduced DaVinci Resolve Software on Mac OSX for $995. According to the folks at DaVinci that can get you realtime uncompressed 10-bit HD (provided you have the hard drive speed and bandwidth to handle it) with maybe 6 or 7 nodes for correction. You can think of nodes as a primary, secondaries or Power Windows. That stands to reason that less bandwidth intensive codecs like ProRes would be able to get more realtime nodes. With one of Blackmagic’s Decklink cards installed, a Tangent Wave control surface and a nice grading monitor (don’t forget the MacPro to run it on) and you suddenly have yourself a color grading suite that was out of reach of most all post-production pros just a few months ago. There appears to be no upgrade path for any current DaVinci owners which is a shame as those folks (my employer included) have paid a lot of money over the years to support and use the DaVinci product. Might some of them jump to something like a Quantel Pablo just to stay uniquely high-end and maybe spite this sudden 180-turn in the DaVinci market? Maybe. But maybe not since that price-point for the new Resolve might be too hard to resist.

DaVinci Resolve with panel

But you will be able to keep your new Resolve Mac a step above that Resolve Mac install down the street by adding an official DaVinci control panel. Part of that DaVinci power lies in that $29,000 panel. It is a cool beast with lots of lights, knobs, displays and a t-handle fader bar. It will allow for some real power when using this software since it is designed to make the system whole. If you only choose the $995 software version then you can also plug-in a Tangent Wave. Might there be Euphonix MC Color or JL Cooper support coming in the future? Maybe. And that $29,000 DaVinci panel with it’s many functions? A USB connection is all it needs.

DaVinci Resolve Linux

If you want to move up to the highest of the high end then the Resolve Linux version uses custom Linux hardware for even more realtime support. That’s been a DaVinci staple forever: realtime color correction. Oh, and if you buy the $49,990 Linux version which includes the panel in that price) you get a Mac license thrown in as well. With that you’d have a nice assist or conform station or another “low end” grading suite to complement your Linux version. I never thought I’d call anything DaVinci low end!

DaVinci Resolve Linux

My bet is you’re going to see a LOT of these Mac Resolves popping up in post houses like dandelions in the spring. My bet is they will replace a fair share of Apple Color installs. And with Apple taking their own sweet time to update Final Cut Studio and Apple Color they will probably say good riddance. I sat through three Resolve demos at NAB 2010 and played with the demo MacPro version myself on two different stops by the Blackmagic booth. I admit I didn’t really know what I was doing (where are those Colorista or Color-like color wheels as I was twirling the trackballs?) but I could instantly see the advantages of realtime playback and advanced features over what is offered in Apple Color.  In one announcement that FXPHD Resolve course just became the hot ticket in town.

You can almost think of Resolve Mac as being the Final Cut Pro of the color grading world. Suddenly everybody (and when i say everybody I mean small/boutique post-houses and one-man-band operations) will have a DaVinci Resolve color grading suite. There will be a lot more shops vying for those grading jobs. That Assimilate Scratch might not be the selling point that it once was. That good colorist is going to be all the more important. 

(Page 1 of 1 pages for this article )

           


I use Apple Color and have been very happy with the results ( a major cable network has been happy with my results too).  What does Resolve have that Color doesn’t?

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/16  at  07:28 AM


I’m not a DaVinci user (yet), but from what I understand, besides the realtime performance, is that it just does everything BETTER. There’s a reason Hollywood post houses all use Resolves rather than anything else.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/16  at  07:51 AM


Resolve give me these features and I’m golden.

1. Allow me import matts from other programs like NUKE and After effects.

2. Give me real time playback of HD (1920x1080) DPX files. Everyone can playback ProRes in real time thats nothing special.

3. Support Tangent CP 200 panel set. A bunch of the facilities where I freelance already have these and I like them.


One clear negative is the fact that I can have only five or six secondaries? Come on that sucks. What is this Apple Color? LOL

Posted by Yohance Brown  on  04/16  at  10:18 AM


I think Scott Simmons is right that BM is going to sell a lot of these.  I looks like the ivory tower that was Pro Color Correction is slowly becoming democratized.  Viva la revolucion!

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/16  at  03:02 PM


@Rowland. The short answer is realtime. When you’ve worked in a realtime grading suite it’s hard to go back, especially for clients. While i haven’t worked on Resolve myself I have worked on a 2K Plus and that realtime is nice. I think also there’s a much more polished feature set to Resolve. But Color can still do some great work and a great control surface makes a huge difference. I’d rather have a great colorist on Color than a mediocre colorist on Resolve.

Posted by Scott Simmons  on  04/16  at  06:29 PM


The positive side is that Resolve is far superior to Color in toolsets, performance, and name recognition. Trying to sell someone in the high end on using Color is a challenge. Offering them a daVinci suite is an instant sale.

How about audio in the timeline? Oh yeah, Color can’t do that.

How about output to tape? Oh yeah, sorry, you have to go back to FCP for that.

Now, for the one place Color has an advantage (for FCP users only) is the conform. Resolve is EDL based only at this point in the game.

Posted by Terence Curren  on  04/17  at  01:15 PM


I think the answer is beyond all the tools available and comparisons between the two.. it’s about the future.

Where is Apple going with Color? No one knows. I want a company that is more dedicated to the tool. BlackMagic seems like the company driving the ship at this point. Maybe Apple will adapt it’s focus a bit, but it seems to really like it’s iPad/iPhone products.

I have been using FCP Suite for over 5 years for a living, but one piece in the cog (Color) might be changing soon.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  04/17  at  11:40 PM


No one ever knows where Apple is going with anything, it is the black hole of information about the future. I think one can surmise from the past that Apple believes it’s future is all about being the content creator, distributor, and maker of the final viewing interface.

Posted by Terence Curren  on  04/18  at  08:49 AM


That’s so true about Apple. People often try to defend their silence with BS excuses about being a publicly traded company, Sarbanes-Oxley and stuff like that. It’s BS as Avid and Adobe to name a few do let their customers know where they are headed. It’s Apple’s choice not to say anything and often difficult for post to plan for the future. IMHO Avid and Adobe care way more about all of us in this field than Apple does so I want to concentrate my work and support on their tools. They have been announced, are currently being demoed and soon to be shipping ...

Posted by Scott Simmons  on  04/18  at  10:33 AM


Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:


 
Orad News and Products from NAB 2012
Jeremiah Karpowicz | 05/18

Learn about what we discovered when we stopped by the Orad booth

image

Shaun Dail from Orad took the time to tell us about what they had to show and talk about at NAB 2012. He tells us about TD Control, a sports specific MAM system as well as their…

Check out a Number of Hardware and Software Options from B&H
Jeremiah Karpowicz | 05/16

Everything you need in one place

image

We grabbed Jerry Zorek, Manager of Business Development at B&H, to learn about what B&H was showing off at their studio booth.  He shows us a Resolve system with the…

How the Blackmagic Cinema Camera will indirectly take sales from AJA, Matrox, and MOTU
Allan Tépper | 05/10

image

What are you talking about Allan? AJA, Matrox, and MOTU don’t manufacturer or sell cameras! How will the Blackmagic Cinema Camera take sales from AJA, Matrox, and MOTU? The reason is related…