Great article! My brain melted, but I liked it.
Posted by ninjanels on 03/26 at 11:06 AM
Sorry about that. Is it the concepts or my writing that turned up the heat? If it’s the writing then I can work on that.
I’ve discovered that I like to feel my brain hurt. It’s fun learning about the hidden side of why things work.
Posted by Art Adams on 03/27 at 12:12 PM
This confirms some things I had suspected. One is that building your own lights using consumer florescent bulbs may result in gaps in the spectrum you’re using.
I’ve thought about using an inexpensive spectroscope to get an idea about the “spectrum density” (I made up that term but it sounds good) of various photographic light sources. I’ve found these two that might work:
http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_3120400 $1.95
http://scientificsonline.com/product.asp_Q_pn_E_3053066 $5.95
Have you tried this? What do you think?
Peace,
Rob:-]
Posted by Rob on 03/30 at 09:16 AM
A quick question: if silver retention is done to the negative, what effect would it have on the shadow areas? Besides graininess, would the contrast in the shadow area be increased as well?
Likewise, a similar question: if done on the positive, what effect would it have on the highlight areas?
Cheers,
Derrick
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 04/19 at 08:51 PM
I think the section of this article relating to additive and subtractive primary colours helps to answer something I was wondering about a while ago: Why exactly does striking a positive print from a colour negative create a positive image?
I think that the answer lies in understanding which of these sets of primary colours balance each other out (R/C, G/M, B/Y?).
Unfortunately, right now my brain is frazzled so I’ll have to work it out later.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 06/05 at 10:27 AM
Okay, I’ve figured it out. It’s very simple if I’m right, probably one of the first things you’d learn if you studied photography formally, but I’m self-taught.
What confused me is hearing and reading references by cinematographers to red, blue and green layers on negative film. I assumed they were referring to the colours of the dyes, which I suppose must be cyan, magenta and yellow on a negative - hence the colour of the image you see when you hold developed negative up to the light. It’s nice to put things together.
Excuse me for cluttering up your comments section.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 06/05 at 10:53 AM