Sony’s latest NXCAM cameras fortunately feature unprecedented new features with their live HDMI outputs, including uncompressed 1080p at 50p or 59.94p, timecode, and even RGB 4:4:4 capabilities as an alternative to the standard YUV 4:2:2 modes. They also offer special pulldown modes for 23.976p (2:3), 25p (2:2), or 29.97p (2:2) (model dependent) with flags to help an external recorder reverse-telecine and recover the original, pure progressive signal. This is great for those of us that —for certain projects— want to record an even better signal than what’s possible inside of the camera with AVCHD. However, today’s external HDMI recorders don’t yet support these new features. This article is about which NXCAM models include these new features, more details about them, and the response from each external recorder manufacturer about the likelihood of supporting these features, either in their current —or future— models. We’ll also explore which new NXCAMs say farewell to 29.97p.
The following are new to the Sony NXCAM family, were shown at NAB 2011, and join the first NXCAM, the HXR-NX5, which were covered here in ProVideo Coalition by Adam Wilt and myself.
Both the NX70 and NX3D1 say goodbye to our familiar 29.97p. If you expect your footage shot with these two NXCAMs to be distributed on an AppleTV, iPad, iPhone, or iPod Touch, then shoot your “normal” shots at 23.976p or 25p, and use 50p or 59.94p exclusively for your slow-motion shots, as I explained in my article Why the iPad will dictate your shooting framerate & shutter speed. If you are shooting with the original HXR-NX5 or the new NEX-FS100 (USA-segregated versions or WorldCam versions), then you still have the option of shooting 29.97p. 4th UPDATE (December 26, 2011): The NX70 will receive it’s missing 29.97p framerate via a free firmware update at the beginning of 2012. Click here for details.
As of publication time of this article, here are the responses I’ve received.
In order to help the external 4:2:2 (and potentially 4:4:4) recorder manufacturers determine which of these features are most important to you when recording from an NXCAM or other camera that may reach the market with some or all of these features, feel free to comment below to place your “vote”. I am sure that they’ll be reading both this article and your “votes” in the comments.
Since I know we have an international audience and we are living in the global village (thanks Marshal McLuhan!), I am constantly researching the possible variants among model numbers in the international marketplace. Often, video equipment manufacturers restrict certain functionality in regional versions, and sometimes they use a strict regional warranty system. Sometimes the manufacturers do this to avoid grey marketing (i.e. to encourage purchasing of products in a local region, to protect local distribution), and sometimes it’s to avoid extremely high import tariffs in a specific market. When they do this, the manufacturers often add a regional suffix to the model number.
When I mention model numbers, I purposely omit regional suffixes when they make absolutely no difference in a product’s features or functionality worldwide. I include these suffixes only when making specific reference to differences among regional variants. So if you see a model number I mention and you are used to seeing that same model number with an “E”, “J”, “N”, “U”, or “P” suffix, what I am writing is applicable to any version, with any suffix. Those few times I do include the suffix, it’s because I am specifically describing features which are specifically added or missing from that version of the product. I encourage all journalists in all media to do the same.
Thanks Allan for this info.
At least Blackmagic is coming out with portable, external uncompressed capture. I question how practical that will really be in terms of space needed.
Other than space issues, would that be compatible in terms of capturing all of this technical ‘stuff’?
Thanks
Posted by wsmith on 06/10 at 07:42 AM
Thanks to VideoPro.com.ua and WSMITH.
WSMITH:
Both Blackmagic and Convergent Design have announced uncompressed recorders. What is yet to be determined with them (or any of the other manufacturers mentioned) decide to support the new special HDMI features and modes. They will be compatible if they decide to make them compatible, and that will be known when they respond to me.
Thanks again for reading.
Allan Tépper
Posted by Allan Tépper on 06/10 at 07:57 AM
I consider pulldown removal and 1080p50 very important. This could become the “Scarlet” for those who don’t want to wait…
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 06/10 at 08:25 AM
Thanks Allan,
I’d have thought that if a cam HDMI sends out uncompressed, as 4:4:4, TC, flags, etc. then anything that captures uncompressed would capture all of that stuff as part of the stream.
I’ve always assumed that capturing uncompressed does so without changing or adulterating the stream. And that the captured stream is agnostic re format, codec, etc. If it’s in the stream. it’ll get captured as is.
One might hopefully think that BMD’s R&D engineers for the Hyperdeck (and Convergent’s) understand the need to get all the data in an uncompressed stream. Otherwise uncompressed capture might not be the holy grail many thought it was.
Thanks again
Posted by wsmith on 06/10 at 08:26 AM
WSMITH,
You are correct, but perhaps didn’t get the fact that this article is about doing that over HDMI, not of HD-SDI. To do these high-end features, this would require dual-link HD-SDI or 3G-SDI, which are things that the camera manufacturers quite purposefully are keeping only in their cameras whose list price is well over US$10,000.
This article (and my interview to the recorder manufacturers) is all about doing all these wonderful things via the HDMI features and modes, which today are unique to these new NXCAMs from Sony.
Allan Tépper
Posted by Allan Tépper on 06/10 at 08:35 AM
I would love to see ProRes 444 over HDMI in a portable device like the KiPro Mini, The Ninja, or one of the others. While I’m a little bummed that you can still only get 8-bit out of the FS100’s HDMI port, all these other features make it more attractive.
If the portable recorder manufacturers don’t step up, I’m curious to see if anyone could develop a bridge from HDMI out on the FS100 to the new Thunderbolt port on a Mac Pro. It’s 2-way and HDMI friendly.
Do you think there may be a software-based solution on the horizon?
Posted by Don Downie on 06/10 at 09:15 AM
Hi Allan,
I did get the HDMI part. Currently, I’m setting my sights on the FS100, which I do understand has no SDI.
If Sony is sending all this special data out on their HDMI as uncompressed, I trust that BMD, and Convergent are mindful that they’d be fools if their gear can’t capture it - if that can indeed be done.
I’m with you completely on your views on this subject. My “purchase impulse” for 2 FS100 cams is now dormant until we learn the answers you seek re these external capture devices.
As good as the the new NXCAMs seem to be technically, if I can’t capture all of the special data that these cameras output in uncompressed, I’m not nearly as hot for them.
Of course I wouldn’t be blaming Sony for the shortcoming. If Sony puts out all that data on HDMI out and no capture device manufacturers can’t handle the challenge, then maybe Sony can with an uncompressed capture solution of their own.
I’m looking forward to your further research on this.
Thanks
Posted by wsmith on 06/10 at 09:20 AM
Mr Downie,
I agree with you completely re FS100 not outputting 10bt over HDMI.
I can’t recall exactly at the moment but weren’t some other cameras capturing 8bit internally, outputting 10bit over HDMI? I thought some newer Sony cam was able to do that. I was really surprised that Sony didn’t give us that in the FS100.
Among the other features I desire I’ve been lusting for 10bit uncompressed output for superior green-screen work.
To be honest, I’m not sure what would be technically preferrable if one had to choose between the following, for green-screen: 8bit uncompressed 4:4:4, Or, 10bit uncompressed 4:2:2?
Posted by wsmith on 06/10 at 09:30 AM
IMHO, having ProRes 4444 or uncompressed is total overkill if you can’t have 10 bit. It’s not only about keying, having more than 8 bit is essential for color correction/grading. It would make this an incredible tool, given the good low-noise and contrast capabilities.
AFAIK, even the EX-1 is delivering 10 bit (via SDI). If the FS100 doesn’t Sony is clearly crippling it to protect the F3.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 06/10 at 12:20 PM
Nomad, my thoughts exactly.
I worked extensively with the EX1 when first released and 2 were acquired by a client I did some work for at the time.
SDI wasn’t part of my workflow so I can’t recall if the EXI was 10bit out on HMDI but I think the EX3 was.
In the years since I’ve warmed up a bit towards Sony, compared to my preference for Canon.
I really have no need to jump at 2 FS100s until I see what they have their sleeve, anyway. We made a good move just playing a waiting game with 2 Pany HMC150s, a 5D and a 7D. Get’s us by quite nicely while we wait for the shakeout on the new cameras.
Allan’s insights here just highlights the need to keep waiting until we see what’s happening, even more so.
Posted by wsmith on 06/10 at 12:44 PM
According to Sony’s Juan Martinez at Cine Gear, the FS100U (US model) is not upgradeable to WorldCam 50/60Hz compatibility; the hardware won’t support it. To shoot 50 Hz formats, you’ll need the FS100E (European) model instead.
Posted by Adam Wilt on 06/10 at 09:34 PM
Quite disappointing! Even the AF101 is switchable.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 06/11 at 12:29 AM
WSMITH:
Considering that the color Green represents approximately 70% of the Luminance channel in a component signal (aka YUV or Y, R-Y, B-Y or Y, Pb, Pr), the difference between recording RGB or YUV will have some bearing with greenscreens, but a tremendous difference with bluescreens or redscreens. What I just wrote assumes that the camera actually processes full bandwidth RGB. If the camera actually processes YUV and the RGB/4:4:4 output over HDMI is simply derived from YUV, then it would offer negligible help for keying, although it would certainly avoid a transcoding generation before use in a program like Apple’s Color, assuming that the external recorder records ProRes444. I do not know for sure whether the FS100 or other NXCAMs are actually imaging RGB or YUV. In Juan Martínez’s explanation about the FS100’s LUT, it seems to be doing a hybrid of the two. Perhaps Juan or Adam can elaborate.
Allan Tépper
Posted by Allan Tépper on 06/11 at 04:43 AM
Thank you Adam. I have updated the article accordingly with this sad news.
Posted by Allan Tépper on 06/11 at 06:30 AM
444 from a camera that costs less than the 444 upgrade to the F3.
Sony is pure evil.
Posted by Charles Angus on 06/28 at 04:00 PM
Well, if it’s 8 Bit, don’t overestimate the potential when compared to YUV.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 06/28 at 09:03 PM
Indeed. Just seems to give the lie to any claim that adding 444 support is hard…
Posted by Charles Angus on 06/28 at 09:06 PM
2nd UPDATE: I have now been requested to set the NEX-FS100 WorldCam status back to “Unconfirmed”. Apparently they are exploring possible ways to make it possible to offer a WorldCam option after all. We hope so!
Posted by Allan Tépper on 06/30 at 05:44 AM
My big question is how does the HXR-NX70 perform in terms of noise?
Allan said “its back-lit Exmor-R sensor (known for low-light sensitivity, image clarity and drastically reduced noise)”. But “drastically reduced noise” compared to what standard?
I know when I’ve compared the Sony FS100 to the Sony NX5U I found they weren’t suitable as a camera pair because the FS100 has such a clean image (even though it was 8 bit HDMI out) compared to the very noisy NX5U image (even though it was 10 bit HD-HDSDI out). I was live switching on a Blackmagic Design 10 bit ATEM 1 M/E.
I even tested the FS100 at 18db of gain and the NX5U at -6db of gain and the FS100 still had less noise.
Posted by Vancouver Videographer on 11/13 at 02:51 PM
Yes, the FS100 is a light monster. I think none of the others has a true video sensor, but photographic ones with higher pixel counts – so, less sensitivity.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 11/13 at 10:15 PM
3rd UPDATE (December 26, 2011): It’s now official! The FS100 is about to go WorldCam via a free firmware update at the beginning of 2012! Click here for details.
4th UPDATE (December 26, 2011): The NX70 will receive it’s missing 29.97p framerate via a free firmware update at the beginning of 2012. Click here for details.
Posted by Allan Tépper on 12/26 at 09:10 AM