(Page 2 of 6 pages for this article  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »)

Thursday, January 31, 2008

review: Sony PMW-EX1 1/2” 3-CMOS HD Camcorder

The quirky first Handycam from Sony’s CineAlta group offers stunning performance.

Design & Handling


The EX1’s basic layout is very similar to other Handycam style camcorders. At just over six pounds in shooting configuration, and sixteen inches from lens shade to eyecup, it’s comparable in weight and size to other HD handhelds like the Sony HVR-Z1 or Panasonic HVX200.

image

Left to right: HVX200, PMW-EX1, HVR-Z1.


The design marries a Fujinon-built lens to a Sony camera; this marriage led to off-center vignetting on a few early EX1s, but current cameras shouldn’t have the problem (owners of afflicted cameras can have their lenses recentered by Sony).

The combination of the new lens, solid-state recording, and other unique features results in a fairly standard package, but one with a few quirks. Perhaps because it’s the first “Handycam”from the CineAlta group, there’s a slightly awkward feel to the beast; it doesn’t balance as well as other Sony handhelds, and some of the controls and connectors aren’t as well implemented as I might have hoped. These aren’t fatal flaws by any means, the camera just requires a bit of getting used to.

Lens Section


The camera starts off with Sony’s unique lens shade / cap, where a slide switch opens and closes two “shutters” built into the shade to cap the lens. First seen on the DSR-PD170, this shade means you’re never without a lens cap, nor do you ever need to worry about where to put the cap when you take it off. The shade bayonets into the front of the lens, and will accommodate at least one 77mm filter behind it.

The 14x Fujinon lens has a knurled, rubberized focus ring that has two modes of operation. It’s like having two lens types in one, so those used to Handycam lenses and those used to broadcast lenses can both be accommodated.

image


When pushed forwards (“AF/MF”), it works like most prosumer focus rings: it free-spins without limit. It can be used in a manual mode, with a “Push AF” button available on the bottom of the lens barrel, or in auto mode with manual override.  It will focus as close as 0.8 meters (about 2.6 feet) with macro off; with macro on (set with a slide switch), the minimum distance shrinks to the front of the lens shade for focal lengths up to about 20mm, then it creeps gradually out to 2.5 feet as you zoom in.

If you push the ring back (“Full MF”), it switches to an absolute-positioning manual mode, just like a “real” lens: it engages an engraved focus scale and turns 120 degrees to travel between infinity and the 0.8m near focus point (macro is not available in absolute mode). I found the focusing scale to be dead-on (the body has a focal-plane mark on it, but the lens scale is calibrated to the front of the glass in video style, not the focal plane as in film style). The focus ring is marked in both meters and feet and displayed through a window on the otherwise-stationary lens housing.  It’s infinitely better than having no focus scale at all, but remember that it only works in Full MF mode: when you switch to AF/MF mode, the scale sits at its last position and doesn’t move as focus changes.

This dual-mode behavior appears to work like the servo/manual zoom on the HVR-Z1 and HDR-FX1 camcorders. The mechanism is always under servo control, but in “Full MF” mode the servo precisely tracks the position of the focusing scale. Even in Full MF mode, you can hear the focus servos running as you focus the lens. Servo tracking is so responsive that, in my experience, it never lagged the focus ring, so the practical effect is every bit as good as a full mechanical focus. Because it is not a traditional mechanical system, there is the chance that it may lose focus under severe vibration, as when using the camera hard-mounted on a vehicle.  I was unable to cause any loss of focus in my tests, and I haven’t heard of any problems with it, but if you plan to use the EX1 as a crash cam or POV cam in harsh conditions—which its SxS recording suits it to—you’d be well advised to test it yourself.

Aft of the focusing scale is a mechanical zoom ring, which turns 90 degrees to traverse the zoom range.  It operates as smoothly as any other broadcast lens’s zoom. It has a stubby zoom handle that can be unscrewed, and those preferring power zoom can flip a switch under the left-side lens motor housing to engage the servo.

Slide switches for auto/manual iris, macro on/off, manual/auto focus, and a “push auto” focus button follow, and then—wonder of wonders—a true, honest-to-goodness iris ring, calibrated in full stops from f/1.9 to f/16, plus C (closed), with perhaps 45 degrees of travel from f/1.9 to f/16. You can read off the stop with much higher precision than with an internal iris using only a viewfinder readout, since you can see exactly where the index mark falls relative to the two nearest stops (nonetheless, there is still a viewfinder readout, with half-stop precision). You can be very precise in your iris setting, as it has effectively infinite positions, and you can do aperture pulls during a shot as slowly as you please without worrying about the “stepping” that occurs with some cameras’ servo-driven irises. Backlash, at least on my unit, was well under 1/6 stop.

It may sound silly, but this manual iris ring is one of the things I most appreciate on the EX1, and feel the lack of most keenly when working with other handhelds (the Canon XH series cams have a ring, but it’s really just a glorified version of the free-spinning, uncalibrated servo thumbwheel found on most handheld cams). I like being able to set my aperture “just so”, and to be able to open or close it the tiniest amount, and to do it quickly and without bother, and the EX1 lets me do that as easily as any “real” lens on a broadcast or film camera does. In this price segment, only the JVC HDV cams with their interchangeable lenses let me set stops as quickly and precisely as the EX1.

Camera Section


On the camera body proper, there’s a three-position ND filter switch (off, 1/8, 1/64; each ND filter is worth three stops), flip switches for gain and white balance, pushbuttons for zebra, peaking, and full-auto modes (the latter contains a green LED that indicated when full-auto is engaged), and three assignable pushbuttons that default to LENS INFO (an onscreen focus and depth-of-field indicator), BRT DISP (a readout of the brightness of the center of the picture) and HISTOGRAM. A fourth assignable button, along with the white balance pushbutton and the shutter switch, sit beneath the lens on the front of the body.

image

Unfortunately, these front-mounted buttons are flush-mounted and hard to find by feel; on several occasions I’ve reset the white balance while fumbling for the shutter switch.  When the camera is tripod mounted, ASSIGN 4 is fairly inaccessible and hard to reach when you need it.

Atop the body, below the handle, are three pushbuttons used to control SHOT TRANSITION (a built-in two-position shotbox allowing preprogrammed changes in focus, zoom, and exposure), a slide switch to turn LCD backlighting on and off, and six membrane switches used to control viewfinder information and toggle colorbars on and off. The membrane switches are impossible to find by feel, and I frequently wind up turning the LCD brightness down while groping for the display on/off button. Sony has cleverly set up bars so that they can be turned off while the camera is running, but not on, so at least you won’t ruin a shot while randomly prodding these buttons.

The handle itself has a fat pod at the front containing stereo mics and the flip-out LCD, with volume and playback control buttons as well as a four-way joystick for menu selection, a lockable start/stop button, and a single-speed zoom rocker with a high/low/off slide switch. There is a shoe mount and a clamp for an external mic, but no 1/4” threaded hole for screw-in accessories.

image



The 3.5” LCD swings out from under the pod and can be rotated through 270 degrees, from facing forwards through facing straight down. However, it can’t be aimed to either side, for use in tight quarters or by an assistant.

Moving aft, there’s a discontinuity between the cylindrical camera section and the squared-off storage section: there’s a ventilation passage running completely through the camcorder.

image

The camera grows warm when it’s turned on, so be aware of this cooling feature when enclosing the camera in a rain cover or underwater case.

Storage Section


image


Two SxS cards slot in behind a sliding cover. Status LEDs light green when a card is inserted but removable, red when a card is being read from or written to. Cards can be hot-swapped and the active card can be selected with a SLOT SELECT button. Dual pots for manual audio control and a MENU button finish off the right side of the camera.

The rear of the camera has a thumbwheel for menu item selection as well as a CANCEL button to back out of menus.  These controls are alternatives to the joystick on the top of the handle, and either set of controls may be used at any time. Likewise, either the thumbwheel or the joystick can be used with Direct Menus (discussed below); I’ve tended to use the thumbwheel over the past few weeks, and as a result the SEL/SET legend above it is nearly worn away, a problem I’ve seen on other EX1s.

image


Four small slide switches toggle the two audio channels between auto and manual gain, and between the internal mics and XLR inputs. A PICTURE PROFILE button pops up the menus for the six picture profiles (image adjustments). A DC IN jack accommodates the cable from the EX1’s AC Adapter and battery charger, while the battery snaps in below. Unfortunately, it’s either/or; the battery can’t be charged on the camera but must be removed, but you’ll want to do that anyway: leaving the battery on the camera will drain it after a couple of days, even with the power turned off.

Of course, that’s if you even manage to turn the power off properly. The power switch is a three-position slide switch: CAMERA/OFF/MEDIA (the latter being the equivalent of “VCR” on old-school tape-based cameras). In practice, it’s very easy to overshoot the central OFF setting, and switch the EX1 from CAMERA mode to MEDIA mode, or vice versa.  As the camera shuts down and restarts in the process, the LCD and EVF go dark for five seconds before lighting up again, so if you overshoot the OFF position and don’t check that the EX1 really is off, it’ll wake right back up, probably after you’ve closed the LCD and packed up for lunch. I have become very aware of the switch’s position, and I wait a good, long time before closing up the LCD… yet I still wind up leaving the camera on by mistake at least once a week.  I’d suggest pulling the battery out whenever you’re shutting down for more than ten minutes.

Right Side


The rotating handgrip dominates the right side of the camera. It rotates from completely flat, through the 30 degree forward tilt in the photos, through about 30 degrees past vertical—very useful when handholding the camera near the ground. The rear of the grip has the start/stop button as well as the rotation release; fortunately the two buttons are very different in feel so it’s easy to tell ‘em apart. Atop the grip are buttons for EXPANDED FOCUS, which works whether the camera is stopped or rolling, and REC REVIEW for seeing the previous shot. These two buttons are well placed for easy access (EXPANDED FOCUS in particular is very handy during run ‘n’ gun operations) but are too close together and too similar in actuation force; fortunately REC REVIEW can’t be activated while the camera is recording. The front of the grip has a multi-pin remote port for start/stop and zoom, similar to but not pin-compatible with a standard Fujinon controller.

The EX1’s handgrip is spaced out from the body, perhaps because of the need to clear the fat rear end of the camera. As a result, it’s a very lopsided support—about four inches off-center—and handholding the camera at eye level with the right hand alone is difficult. With the grip flat, it’s harder to keep level than the Panasonic HVX200, the previous winner in the hard-to-handhold sweepstakes; the smoothly rounded grip affords no purchase and the whole camera simply slumps to the left. I’ve found the best way to deal with it is to rotate the grip to about 30 degrees; this lets you use your thumb along the ridge of the handgrip as a leverage point, and also lets the leading edge of the rear section rest, somewhat uncomfortably, against the base of your thumb.  The torque thus provided lets you operate with the right hand alone, at least for short periods, so that your left hand can toggle various switches, adjust audio gain, or reposition the LCD.

image


Normally, though, your left hand wants to be under the camera, supporting it and taking some load off your right wrist. I found it useful to leave my tripod plate attached; it gives me a shelf to park on my left palm while leaving my fingers free to fiddle with zoom and focus. Operating without the plate works almost as well, but cramps my left hand up against the body a bit more, limiting my reach.

image



Of course there are a variety of support rigs available from third parties, like shoulder stocks and body braces, that can help take the load off, and mounting the camera on a tripod, dolly, or Steadicam makes the problem go away.  When transitioning between mounted and handheld operations, watch out for the grip: in some positions its leading edge projects below the plane of the camera’s baseplate, interfering with whatever the camera is mounted on.

The SDI BNC connector resides at the right rear corner of the camera. It comes with an untethered rubber cap that will fly off and become lost at the earliest opportunity. A 4-pin i.Link (1394) port and 1/8” stereo headphone jack occupy the right side of the carry handle, near the EVF, and have tethered rubber caps. The analog outputs and USB connector all occupy space below the rotating handgrip, behind a stiff plastic cover. The cover is hard to snap open and closed and interferes with the handgrip; once you get it open, any cables plugged in interfere with the handgrip and prevent you from handholding the camera unless the grip is rotated to the fully forward position.

The USB connector is used for transferring clips to and from computers. The EX1 uses the same micro-D-shell connector used by most Sony HDV cameras for analog component outputs, and another micro connector carries stereo analog audio and composite video, and Y/C with the optional VMC-15FS cable. While the EX1 comes with breakout cables, the lack of any standard video connector other than the SDI spigot means you should carry those special cables with you on shoots—or simply abandon any external monitoring using analog signals.

image


The SDI and analog video connectors are output-only. The camera can record HDV-compatible inputs on i.Link, but it cannot record SDI or analog inputs.

Dual XLRs on the right side of the carry handle accept line or mic signals, and provide +48v phantom power. Each is individually switchable; in combination with the selections on the camera’s back panel, you can set up one input to use the internal mic on auto gain, while the other is manually controlled line level, or mic level with phantom, or any other possible combination of inputs you might desire.

image



Displays


The 3.5” LCD is fully daylight readable, and it’s the best LCD I’ve seen on a handheld: it uses 480 rows of 640 RGB triads, or 1920 total elements per line. The dot structure on the LCD is so fine that I have to move to within six inches to see any pixelization at all. It resolves about 500 TVl/ph horizontally and 400 vertically. Even without the EXPANDED FOCUS pushbutton on the handgrip, which enlarges the image by 2x, this LCD is usable for HD focusing—at least, it’s the first such on-camera LCD that makes me feel reasonably confident I’ve got the focus right, even in its normal display!

The EVF, by contrast, is merely as good as the EVFs or LCDs of other handheld cams: the dot structure is plainly visible, and it resolves only 300 TVL/ph horizontally and 200 vertically. This is about what I see on HVR-Z1, and it’s better than the EVF and LCD on the HVX200. In practice I keep the EX1’s LCD on even when I’m using the EVF for eye-level shooting, because I can focus the EX1 with the LCD, while the EVF leaves me playing a dangerous guessing game—the same guessing game all the other handheld cams I’ve used heretofore have made me play.

Both LCD and EVF show the entire raster, without overscanning. You don’t have to worry about turning “underscan” on to see the borders of the image, because you can always see the borders. This is the way it should be.

The data overlays on the displays are among the best around. Almost every status readout you can imagine is available, and each can be enabled individually in the menus. There are also a histogram, dual zebras (differentiated both by direction and by thickness), and a digital peaking overlay offered in any of four colors—white, red, yellow, or blue. Any of a variety of markers can be overlaid.

image


The LENS INFO button displays a focusing scale with a white bar indicating the depth of field for the current zoom and aperture settings.  Unfortunately the bar itself has no thin black outline, as do the rest of the data display elements, so it can be hard to see against a bright background. On my sample camera, too, the focus readout was off: four feet measured between lens and test target, and four feet as read from the lens barrel, was shown as about 3.5 feet in the Lens Info display. Other distances similarly read about 10% too near. I don’t know if this is a discrepancy in this one camera or if others suffer from it, too.

When all this information gets in the way, a single push of the DISPLAY button makes it all go away—and I mean all of it. Nothing, not even a recording indication, is left on the screen. Another push of the button brings it all back.

In MEDIA mode, the displays default to a 12-up thumbnail display, which handily shows up on the video outputs, too. Pressing the thumbwheel or joystick pops up a context-sensitive menu, letting you display clip info, add a shot mark, delete the clip, or “expand clip”: display 12 thumbnails spaced through the clip.  Clip info shows you the more details about the current clip, and you can move to the previous and next clips without returning to the 12-up display.

image
image


Etc.


The camera comes with an infrared remote, capable of limited control: start/stop, zoom, momentary autofocus, and playback controls. Unfortunately, the camera is only sensitive when the remote is held in front of it, not behind, and the remote is ignored by default. You have to enable it in the menus, and you must repeat this whenever you cycle the camera’s power. These peculiarities limit the remote’s usefulness.

The power supply is an auto-sensing 110/220 V unit. It feeds the camera through a permanently attached cable, or charges a battery at the flick of a switch.

CamerasProduction

(Page 2 of 6 pages for this article  <  1 2 3 4 >  Last »)



My First Shoot with the Sony F35

Art Adams | 11/16- 06:41 PM

Review: Hood-Pro Sock-loupe

Adam Wilt | 11/10- 06:54 PM

Dymo DiscPainter Review

Matt Jeppsen | 10/31- 09:10 PM

Scarlet Killers - Attack of the HD DSLRs!

Steve Hullfish | 10/30- 01:47 PM



Great review Adam; nice and thorough. Kinda makes me want to run out and get one right now… Quick question and maybe I didn’t catch it in your review, but did you happen to notice whether the battery drained rather quickly if it was left in?

Posted by  on  02/01  at  03:43 PM


Adam, that is a great review.  I want to pass on a shoulder brace that I found that is specifically designed for the Sony PMW EX1.  I have been using it for a few days now and love it.
Here is the link:
http://www.studio1productions.com/vsb1.htm

I hope this helps other EX1 owners
Rob

Posted by  on  02/01  at  04:51 PM


> It may be a pain to handhold and some of its controls and connectors could use
> some improvement, but the PMW-EX1 has raw resolution, latitude, highlight
> handling, flexibility, and tweakability unmatched by anything else under
> $10,000.

I’d probably say under $20,000.

You don’t’ say what resolution the red chip was shot at 1080 or 720.

Optical performance: what the metal beam bent or is the barrel distortion uneven?

Given that the HVX-200 resolves beyond it’s chips, is there a way to test the EX1 for resolution beyond 1000 lines?

> Thus 25p frames suffer a 1/50 sec top-to-bottom delay, and 24p frames take
> 1/60 sec.

Can you elaborate on how 1/24 images are taken at 1/60 a second? You mentioned the camcorder has a blade angle adjustment, which would change the length of time the light is collected, also a “slow shutter.” How do these play into a default 1/60 second shutter? I ask because your description:

> At 24p, no shutter is 1/24. Speeds: 1/32, 1/48, 1/50, 1/60… SLS frames
> accumulated: 2-8.

Would imply that there is nothing between 1/32 and two complete frames on top of each other. Not one long frame of 1/15, 1/8, 1/4, 1/2, etc.

Posted by Anthony  on  02/01  at  06:42 PM


Marco: “Jellocam” is a trademark of AJW’s Cameralogical Neologisms, Inc. Use it again and you’ll owe me licensing fees. <grin>.

Leo: yes, the battery drains after 2 or 3 days.

Anthony:
• The round red thing was shot in 1080-line mode (there is no 60i in 720, only 60p).
• The metal beam is straight (it carries 3- and 10-ton cranes, so it had better be straight!); that’s the “moustache distortion” to which I refer.
• The HVX200’s lens resolves past its chips, which is why it aliases so vigorously; the EX1 does, too, just not so much.
• A 1/24th-second image isn’t captured in 1/60 second, it’s just that the bottom line’s 1/24th second happens 1/60 second delayed compared to the top line of the image. Like a tube camera, there’s a sequential readout of the image, as opposed to a CCD’s frame-at-a-time simultaneous capture.
• When I say “no shutter is 1/24”, I mean “shutter OFF is 1/24”, sorry for the confusion. As to no intermediate speeds: use ECS for fractional speeds from 1/31.98 on up. For slow speeds, use SLS: slow shutters from 2-8 frames in duration. But AFAIK there’s nothing between 2 frames and 1/24, and between 1/24 and 1/31.98.

Posted by Adam Wilt  on  02/01  at  08:45 PM


So now what do I do if I own two, count ‘em… two XHA1’s?  This is why being in this business can be so damned expensive!

Posted by  on  02/01  at  10:11 PM


UPDATE: At 24fps, 2 frames is 1/12 sec, 3 frames is 1/8 sec, 4 frames is 1/6 sec,… 8 frames is 1/3 sec. So yes, all those slow speeds are there; they’re just given in frame durations instead of time. Sorry for not seeing this bloody obvious fact last night (note to self: never comment when you’re too tired to think straight).

Scott: two XH A1s? Be on the leading edge and shoot 3D. 3D is the Next Big Thing… again…

But seriously, XH A1s are still very fine cameras; in the sub-$10k arena I think they are second only to the EX1 when it comes to 1080i image quality, and they’re much easier to use handheld than the EX1. They perform today every bit as well as they did a few days ago, they do some things (like tape recording and standard definition) the EX1 can’t, and they’re already paid for. The ecosystem is a bit more crowded now, but the XH A1s still have their niche.

Posted by Adam Wilt  on  02/02  at  08:15 AM


The overcrank in 25p mode actually goes up to 60p not 50p, just don’t use it when using artificial lighting or you will get flicker like i have!

Posted by Philip Bloom  on  02/02  at  12:13 PM


oh, and you can play back overcranked in playback in the camera,
But GREAT review, very fair! Nice one.

Posted by Philip Bloom  on  02/02  at  12:15 PM


As always a great and detailed review. Thank you Adam. The only bit missing IMHO is that you do not talk about the audio side of this extraordinary (for its price) EX1. Could you post further details. I am a shoot-and-run cameraman and normally am not able to have the luxury of an accompanying sound man, so on-board mics and sound are important considerations for me.
Many thanks in advance, John

Posted by  on  02/03  at  04:35 AM


I have shot a lot one man band with it and it’s worked great. The built in mic is OK, I stick a nicer one on top and use that as my main camera mic. I mount a radio mic receiver on the hot shot. All works great.

Posted by Philip Bloom  on  02/03  at  04:44 AM


A stunning review, Adam. Thank you.

Do you have similar sensitivity numbers for the Z1? How does the EX1 compare? I have seen reports of a half stop more sensitive (a disappointment) to almost 3 stops better (too good to be true?). How do the 2 cameras’ noise levels compare with increased gain, say at +6, +12 & +18db?

Chuck

Posted by Chuck Savadelis  on  02/03  at  06:04 AM


Adam,

Great review.

I am very surprised by 10 stops of dynamic range.

Using the same criteria, how does that compare to other cameras you have tested?

I am particularly interested in the HVX, RED, F23 and Kodak film.

Posted by Eric Pascarelli  on  02/03  at  08:33 AM


Philip: 60fps in 25p? Great!
John: audio sounds “pretty good” but I haven’t done a formal evaluation yet. Check back in a couple of weeks when I have another EX1 to work with.
Chuck & Eric: Z1: ISO 160, HVX: ISO 320: http://www.adamwilt.com/HD/4cams-part1.html
I was surprised by the 10 stop latitude, myself. The HVX has about 8-9.3 depending on how you measure (http://www.dv.com/columns/columns_item.php?articleId=193001363). In a RED test last September I initially saw a bit over 8 stops with an early version of RedAlert; with a recent version of RedCine I’m seeing over 9 stops in the same footage, and RED has improved their latitude in later builds of the camera. When I have one to test for real, you’ll see the results here at PVC. F23 is said to be very, very good in this regard, and I’ve been impressed with the pix, but I haven’t tested it formally. As to Kodak film, I don’t recall what they’re claiming for Vision 2 emulsions, something like 11-12 stops? More? The Expression 500T, especially: it makes a gorgeous picture, and the sensitometric curve certainly implies 12 stops: http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products/negative/tech5218.jhtml?id=0.1.4.6.10.12.4&lc=en

Posted by Adam Wilt  on  02/03  at  02:11 PM


I heard someone complaining recently about not being able to erase SxS card A while B was still recording. Is this true? In other words, the maximum amount of continuous record time would be the total of your two cards--no on the fly offloading and reusing of cards.

Posted by Jason Prisk  on  02/03  at  06:29 PM


yep. just like the p2. How could you erase in cameras whilst recording? That doesn’t make sense.

If you are doing on the fly offloading and reusing, you erase your card in your pc/mac after dumping then put it back in.

Posted by Philip Bloom  on  02/03  at  09:48 PM


Excellent review, as always, Adam.
All of the footage I’ve seen so far is a strong selling point for the EX1.

One concern though is that some users have reported battery drainage when the camera is supposed to be off. Due to the fact that there’s a backup lithium button cell in the base of the camera for maintaining date and time info, one would think that there is no need to have the camera always powered on at some hibernation level, hence no need to drain the battery that powers the camera.

Of concern to some is how to edit this footage. Some are claiming CineForm works for them. I have also found that MainConcept’s MPEG Pro HD3 gives Premiere CS3 the ability to work with XDCam footage, just as transparently as HDV footage, minus the ability to play back on a second monitor with a dual-head graphics card. Sound is there, as with video and the MainConcept CODEC appears to bring all the functionality for .MXF files. So the workflow is XDCam -> Sony Clip Browser -> Export to MXF -> import to Premiere Pro CS3.

I have been testing with downloaded clips, but in a few hours UPS will be delivering my first PMW-EX1, and I will be doing some serious testing then. Hopefully Sony has fixed all the earlier problems with vignetting, battery drain, etc.

Posted by Mark Weiss  on  02/04  at  08:25 PM


Thanks for the review, Adam. I plan to order one, but I have a serious concern about how to remotely operate and monitor the camera while on a crane.

I’ve been googling it for weeks and still can’t find a solution. It seems that Sony moved away from their standard LANC connection on this camera. So, there may not be a way to control iris/focus/zoom remotely. I did see the remote zooms available, but nothing else.

Also, with monitoring, is there a way to use a standard crane/camera-mounted LCD monitor with this camera, or do I have to buy some high-priced solution?

Thanks for your help, in advance.

Posted by Daniel Brienza  on  02/06  at  09:03 PM


To update, I received my PMW-EX1, s/n 102161, on Feb 5th.
I tested the audio, and it is DAT-quality.
In all other respects, camera performed as well or better than I expected, based on all the reading I’d done on it.

However, there is bad news… after 5-1/2 hours of use, the next day, I attempted to used the camera and seeing the weather was nice that day, I stepped outside and attempted to shoot some daylight scenery. I first deleted the images on the SxS card, as it was nearly full, and attempted to zoom in on a particular piece of foliage. The camera was wildly out of focus. I checked to see if I was on manual, but it was indeed set to auto.
The other thing was that the picture was wildly overexposed and the iris was at f1.9, instead of closing down with the bright light of the outdoors. I could not get a response from the auto iris. I could manually adjust it, but auto was just not working.
I then discovered that the menus and picture profiles were not responding when their respective buttons pressed. The camera had locked up and lost it’s ‘mind’.
I turned off the power, but the camera would not power down, either, after a couple of tries. I removed the battery and then powered back up, thinking it may be the odd random lockup. But the camera only displayed “XDCAM EX” in the viewfinder and would not power down when switched off. Five minutes later, the display appended “E-15030” to its logo. Obviously, some critical error. I can find nothing on the problem on Google.
I called B&H;, and after some troubleshooting, they offered to exchange the camera.
I have owned five other Sony cameras, and all have been reliable with no failures. I am hoping the XDCam EX1 is not being manufactured in a ‘cost-saving’ process that results in shortened component lifespan. I really hope this is a rare fluke.
Two days have passed and I am still waiting for the store to send me the prepaid return shipping label so I can get the exchange process moving. Until then, I have a $7000 brick on my hands.

Posted by Mark Weiss  on  02/07  at  11:06 AM


Mark,

Your story’s inspired me to remember to get mine insured. Digital items react that way, and there’s no exception to a EX1, which is basically all computerized. My iPhone froze once, and I almost had heart failure. I’d really lose it if my EX1 did that out of warranty.

Posted by  on  02/07  at  01:01 PM


I used to by ‘extended service contracts’ but by and large, I find that most of the time you don’t use them and they become a bad investment. If you have one repair done over the life of the camera, that pretty much equals the cost of a 3 year contract in typical cases. So unless the camera breaks several times, requiring several trips back to the repair facility, a service contract may be wasted money.

UPS finally e-mailed me the shipping label, around 7PM, so it will have to go out tomorrow. So it looks like mid-week next week before I see a replacement. Meanwhile the 15-day trial on the CineForm that I am testing ticks away, with no camera to test with.

Posted by Mark Weiss  on  02/07  at  04:35 PM


Daniel: the lens remote port allegedly has zoom and start/stop functionality, but that’s it. You could possibly run a fiber-optic conduit between the camera’s IR receiver and the IR remote’s LED for limited additional functionality (e.g., push-to-focus). Your best bet would be to use external motors driving the toothed rings for iris and zoom, and add a clamp-on toothed ring for focus (the matte box / follow-focus folks will be making these); I’ll probably wind up doing that myself as I expect to fly an EX1 from a jib. As to monitoring, you have composite, component, and SDI to choose from, but see my comments about downconversion quality.

Mark: Sorry about your dead camera! Electronics tend to follow a “bathtub curve” for problems: lots of infant mortality, then years of long running, then lots of failures towards end of life (the “bathtub curve “ describes the shape of the plot of frequency of failures vs. time). I’ve only had two infant mortality failures: an HVR-M10 that developed a scrambled display after fifteen minutes (!) of operation, which B&H;replaced with no bother or fuss; and an Apple TiBook 800 which stopped working on battery power after two weeks, which Apple fixed for free on a two-day turnaround. Both the fixed TiBook and the replacement HVR-M10 are working as I write this. In all likelihood your replacement EX1 will work properly for years--but still, what a disappointment when a shiny new camera goes totally mad and has to be swapped out!

Posted by Adam Wilt  on  02/07  at  10:59 PM


Any issues with rolling shutter artifacts?

Posted by Rich Reilly  on  02/08  at  06:51 AM


Adam, indeed, that is the nature of most solid state electronics. My wife works in semiconductor manufacture, and she says all it takes is one microscopic impurity on a photomask to cause later problems with the ICs. Some grow “whiskers” across connections and fail internally.
The other new failure mode we get to look forward to is RohS compliant (lead-free) soldering, which has a whisker growth problem, causing short circuits on fine-pitch surface mount components after a few months of operation. Lead in solder used to inhibit this growth, but the new lead-free soldering has issues that have yet to be worked out. That’s why the military electronics is exempt from RohS compliance.
I sincerely hope that is not a contributing factor with the XDCam!
I finally got my shipping label from B&H;/UPS last night, and I dropped off the camera at UPS today. So maybe by Tuesday or Wednesday I should have a replacement in-hand. Hopefully, a perfect replacement with no other problems that this one didn’t have!

Posted by Mark Weiss  on  02/08  at  11:18 AM


Hmmm..found this regarding rolling shutter and less than ideal fuorescent conditions:

http://dvxuser.com/jason/CMOS-CCD/

Wouldn’t this type of thing make documentary style problemmatic? Not likek there’s always time or ability to remove offending fixtures.

Posted by  on  02/08  at  01:55 PM


Rich,

You can easily shoot “slow” fluorescents with the EX1 by making sure that your shutter is set to 1/24, 1/30, 1/40 1/60 or 1/120 in 60Hz countries or 1/25, 1/50, 1/100 in 50Hz countries - Just like a film camera!  And no need to remove offending fixtures unless the are really flickering, like when Godzilla walks by.

Posted by Eric Pascarelli  on  02/08  at  03:03 PM


Rich: I haven’t seen anything like the flickery fluorescent clip, and I shot a lot under magnetically-ballasted line-rate fluorescents. My guess from looking at the clip is that a higher-than normal shutter speed was used; that would easily explain the banding (the color of fluorescent light varies during each part of the AC cycle), however I cannot guarantee that’s the situation Barry had in his test clip.

If you shoot with a shutter speed that’s a multiple of the half-wave duration (1/100 in 50Hz countries; 1/120 in 60 Hz countries), then every scanline in the image should be able to integrate the color changes over time in the same way. and this sort of banding should not occur. And obviously if the driving frequency of the fluorescents is neither 50Hz nor 60Hz some fine-tuning with ECS will be needed to fix the pix.

The good news is that this sort of thing is immediately visible in the LCD so you can play with shutter speeds to reduce or eliminate it.

Posted by Adam Wilt  on  02/08  at  03:10 PM


Is 35 Mbps VBR peak or average rate? In case it is peak rate, it only improves storage efficiency, but not quality respect an hypotetic 35 Mbps CBR, and only 35/25=1.4 (40%) more than the HDV 25 Mbps CBR mode. And having in account that 1920/1440=1.333, you only have 1.4-1.333=0.067 (6.7%) more information per pixel in the hi mode. Unless I miss something about the algorithms that rule the 35 Mbps codec respect the ordinary 25 Mbps HDV codec.

Posted by Jose Ignacio Simon  on  02/08  at  11:52 PM


Adam great review, keep them coming!

Posted by  on  02/09  at  03:36 PM


Can the EX1 output a 1394 DV down-converted signal in DV NTSC from the sxs card media.  I am looking for an easy way to deliver on DV for those customers that need to walk with a tape at day end or next day fed ex, and I am very interested in the EX1 as I have used it with impressive results several times, but never tried to do a DV down convert.  My now sold, HVR-Z1u would do and most HDV cameras I have used will do. If not is there a High quality, quick, way to get xdcam EX out to DV with a DV camera or deck without SDI.
I have an 8 core Mac Final cut 6 workstation and a MacBook pro laptop available, but initial test seem like long renders to get proper quality DV without nasty aliasing & jittery artifacts.

Posted by Anthony Miles  on  02/10  at  08:46 AM


Here’s a link to a few 8-pin Fujinon lens controllers at B&H;. I assume that one of those would work with the EX1?

Matt Jeppsen
http://www.FreshDV.com

Posted by Matt Jeppsen  on  02/10  at  03:46 PM


Jose: I think the 35Mbps is the average rate. And yes, while the aggregate bits-per-sample rate is much the same between SP and HQ modes, recall that HQ is frame-rate-native, so no bits are wasted on repeated fields or frames. Also, even the 25Mbps SP mode seems cleaner on the EX1 than on my old Z1; Sony has improved the codec in general.

Anthony: No, there’s no DV downconversion. Sometimes the older cameras do things the newer cameras can’t. We live in a mixed-up SD/HD world and the EX1 is a pure HD camera—nice if you work entirely in HD, otherwise the EX1 may be a step too far into the future. See also http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/awilt/story/whither_the_hvx200/.

Matt: I haven’t tried any of these, but my understanding from various sources is that standard Fujinon controllers shouldn’t work on the EX1. I’d be very happy to be proven wrong, though.

Posted by Adam Wilt  on  02/10  at  08:39 PM


I find that I don’t need to edit and master in SD anymore, as it’s just as efficient to edit in HD as SD, and with the added advantage that you can output either format from a decent NLE. In the very beginning of my transition to HD, it was nice to have the ability to record HD and capture SD, but our new editing system can handle HD with equal applom, so there is no longer any reason to edit in SD. I don’t miss the SD conversion and in fact, that leaves more room for a better HD camera with fewer design compromises.

I’m also glad to hear the 25mb/S CODEC is cleaner than earlier HDV CODECs. Are the SQ clips fully compatible for drag and drop into Premiere, like HDV? If they are, that would make a good transition format to shoot in until MainConcept and CineForm get their Premiere compatibility issues worked out.

Posted by Mark Weiss  on  02/10  at  10:17 PM


Great Review! When it was first released, there were issues with editing the footage in Apple Final Cut Pro. I was just wondering if anyone knows if this has been resolved yet or has had any personal experience with this camera and final cut pro? Thanks!

Posted by  on  02/11  at  10:19 AM


In terms of Archiving / Delivery, what are the thoughts out there about archiving and or delivering footage on DVD or Blue Ray DVD? In other words, dump the footage from the SXS onto an external hard drive using the Mac Book Pro and then burn a DVD / Blue Ray (using a fire wire blue ray drive). The client could walk away at the end of the day with a DVD instead of a tape. The shooter would keep a backup on the external drive. The real question here, is how easy is it to covert the XDCam footage into regular quicktime files, before putting them onto the disk?

Posted by  on  02/11  at  10:45 AM


Only trouble with reviews such as yours is that it makes me want to buy a camera that’s unnecessarily good for my needs.  I’m a wedding and events man and buying the Z1 a few years ago seemed overkill in some ways. Of course now I see it wasn’t, and now I see the EX1 breathes deep where the Z1 struggles in asthmatic confusion.

We sat side-by-side on the ‘Experts Q & A group’ at the 2007 Video Forum in Earls Court, London, Adam.  Remember?

tom.

Posted by  on  02/12  at  08:55 AM


Hi Adam,

Thanks for a great review of the camera!  I’m planning to purchase one shortly after NAB this year.  I want to first figure out what additional accessories that I want to get with it so I can do one large bulk purchase all at once.  I saw that Varicam might have a remote zoom & soon to be announced remote focus controller for the EX1.
Oh, and I just got my latest copy of DV Magazine - On the cover it mentiones a DV.Com exclusive of ‘Real-World Testing: Sony’s PMW-EX1’.  Is your article located here that DV.COM exclusive?  (Which has no links to here that I could find on the DV.COM site, but quickly observed on hvxuser.com?) Just curious - Oh, and if you’re at NAB I’ll try to say hello.

~Jonathan Tanner

Posted by  on  02/12  at  10:29 PM


Hello Adam and all,

Thank you for the great review Adam. I’ve been a long time reader of your articles and am always appriciate your thoughts.

Question regarding using the EX1 to deliver a Standard Definition DVD. I have found some serious compression artifacts in my final DVD.

My process is (and I will try to be ridiculously detailed):

1)Shoot 1080 30P and import using XDCAM transfer software.

2)Bring clips into FCP. When I lay them into the timeline, FCP asks to change the sequence settings to match my footage - I say “yes”

3) Change my render option to ProRes 422.

4) Edit . . . wow it looks great on the screen.

5) Output using compressors 90 min DVD best settings.

6) Lay that puppy into DVD Studio and burn.

7) Watch it on tv. At this point there are artifacts and it seems almost jittery . . like its had too much coffee.

Any thought from anyone on how you are getting the best picture onto a DVD?

I’ve gone through numerous tests . . . probably 15-20?? This is the best I can find and I’m still not thrilled.

Thank you for your thoughts and ideas.

Eero
http://www.videoonestudio.com

Posted by Eero Johnson  on  02/13  at  04:48 PM


Mark: while the SP essence is supposed to be HDV compatible, the wrapper format is MP4, so drag’n’drop into Premiere may not work; I don’t have Premiere so I can’t say for certain. Try Googling “EX1” and “Premiere”; someone is likely to have an answer somewhere--just not here!

Adrian: with the current software versions (as described) there are no issues I’ve encountered with FCP editing (with the possible exception of doubly-listed clips in the browser, which I’m still trying to track down the cause of; doesn’t happen all the time).  On Mac, XDCAM Transfer creates QuickTimes, so that part’s easy. Archiving on various flavors of DVD is too big a topic for the comments section; try the EX1 section of the forums: http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/forums/viewforum/4/

Tom: unless you invest heavily in SxS cards, the Z1 may remain the better bet for weddings… those L-O-N-G ceremonies, y’know. Yes, I remember seeing you at Video Forum--great show! Almost a mini-IBC, and certainly worth attending if you’re in the greater London area.

Jonathan: the only DV.com article I’ve written on the EX1 is at http://www.dv.com/reviews/reviews_item.php?articleId=196603659. I don’t have the latest print issue yet so I don’t know what they’re referring to, sorry.

Eero: solving DVD creation problems is too big a topic for the comments section of a camera review (!); best start a thread in the forums: http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/forums/. All I can suggest (and all I’ll say here) is that you probably need to filter the high detail frequencies, especially vertically, to get the picture to look clean and quiescent on a standard-def interlaced display; HD downscaled to SD without prefiltering can alias severely, cause cross-color on composite feeds, and twitter insanely on CRTs.

Everyone: thanks for the great comments, but this conversation is getting too long and involved for a mere comments section! There’s an EX1 forum at http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/forums/viewforum/4/, so please continue the conversation there.  We are literally going to run up against the max-comments limit if we keep posting here.

Also, I’m going to prune a couple of off-topic comments (who was at VideoForum, and when); no disrespect intended, I just want to keep the signal-to-noise ratio high. On CML we’d say “take it to chat!’, so if you want to, set up a “chat” topic at http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/forums/ and hold forth at length as you see fit there.

Posted by Adam Wilt  on  02/13  at  05:56 PM


4:2:0 MPEG recording.

Posted by Bill Nelson  on  02/14  at  02:03 PM


I was planing on capure on several camaras (sonys hzr z1u, a canon hxal(pLUS TELO)AND USE and a newer handheld like the new sony Hdr Sr 12. Question , new sony ex1 captures in 4:2:0. WERE i WAS GOING FOR 4;2;2 or 4;4;4 BLACKMAGIC ON CAPTURE?EDITING. Can I still capure my other camaras at 4:2:2 or 4:4:4 TO AND EDIT TOGETHER FINAL PRODUCT THAT LOOKS GOOD. which edit software? Thanks Robert

Posted by  on  02/15  at  02:13 PM


I saw a demo in Milwaukee last Wed. Seems there is no iris check button on the lens. This button is tandard on broadcast setups..guess it’s not part of the non-bayonet crowd.

Posted by Rich Reilly  on  02/18  at  09:00 PM


Greetings from Oz!

Adam: About Warranty on the very expensive SxS cards. How many “uses” should one provide before it gives up? 100? 500? Shouldn’t they come with a FIVE year warranty, not ONE?

I’m yet another invested in weddings (yes, yes, I know...), often two, sometimes three a weekend. Not a huge fan on the thought of getting home at midnight on a Saturday, down-loading the day’s footage, doing a back-up, checking the whole lot thoroughly before (nervously and hesitantly) erasing the footage on the two SxS’s - then try and get a good night’s sleep in preparation for Sunday’s job.

Just won’t do, seems a little dodgy. So I’ll need at least FOUR 2-hour cards when they become available. But over here, 2-hour cards will be initially sold for in excess of $2000 EACH! Love the thought of going tapeless, even do a little culling as I tuck into the salmon at the reception to keep busy. But, hmmm…

As to camera options: Have been using for some time a DSR-250 with a 16:9 lens adaptor (shock, horror I know - fiddly, but better in low-light than Z1’s and the like; and with a 3-hour recording time). I’m well aware I need decent widescreen images that look sharper on those ever-improving displays… Unfortunately also, my 250’s replacement, the 270 (the camera I’ve really been waiting for!), is 2 kilos heavier! Ten-hour wedding days! Oh my back!

In short, need: Wide-screen; 2 lux or better low-light; long recording time; not-too-heavy; cheap, achival back-up (I still re-use 184DVCAM tapes after ten years!); great on-board sound; with acceptable standard DVD product at the end (for 90%+ couples and their parents, Blueray and HD-DVD ain’t gonna happen), even though they look a little crappy on OK plasmas and LCDs.

Asking too much?

Posted by  on  02/19  at  02:42 PM


Hi Adam,
With reference to my post here on Feb 2nd, I wonder if you have had an opinion to test in depth the audio side of the EX1. Sofar all info in this area has been a bit vague and a serious hands-on opinion would be very useful to low budget free-lancers like myself. With much thanks in advance. John

Posted by  on  02/21  at  06:55 AM


Hi John,
I think I can answer that question, as I too am very critical of camera audio.

I tested it and it is DAT-quality.

Here’s the results charts:

http://www.basspig.com/Sony%20PMW-EX1%20Line%20In%20Audio%20Test%202.htm

Posted by Mark Weiss  on  02/21  at  09:22 AM


Why we won’t be getting the EX1.

The folks at Snader were kind enough to loan me the EX1 for a day, and I ran a number tests to compare it to the Z1s we are currently using. I shot identical scenes with both cameras. First, all the accolades concerning the image quality of the EX1 are well deserved. In my judgement, it’s a little more than a stop faster (at 1080i), with a greater dynamic range. In SP mode (the mode we are most likely to use), it was visibly sharper than the Z1 (but not hugely sharper). I found the knee settings to greatly enhance the image quality in the high-contrast, uncontrollable lighting situations we often encounter. Despite all of this, we will not be buying EX1s (and we would have bought 3).

Our shooting days typically run 10-16 hours and seventy percent of our work is handheld. I shot the EX1 handheld for about an hour and my hand was sore for two days, especially the inner side of the thumb knuckle. My hands are not large (9” span) and I was constantly stretching and adjusting my grip to keep in contact with the record button. What was worse, my partner (female), with smaller hands, could not reach the record button at all (at least not with any sort of non-contortionist grip). For us, this camera is unusable. The much ballyhooed grip is an ergonomic disaster. I find myself wondering “What was Sony THINKING?”!

Posted by Chuck Savadelis  on  02/22  at  07:01 PM


Does anyone know if the EX1 demo footage DVD sent out by Sony was shot entirely with the EX1? I mean, were the testimonial interviews done with the EX?
If you haven’t seen it, get one. It’s worth a few minutes to check out the test pilot ftg shot from the interior.

Posted by Rich Reilly  on  02/27  at  04:04 PM


Hi Adam , great review, just bought the ex1 and immediately fly out to bolivia and brazil for a documentary, ive been noticing a jittery effect on pans and motion shots, shooting at hq 1080 24 p . i dont have an hd monitor , only review clips on a sony laptop in the clip browers. is this a correctable problem, any suggestions, change the frame rate etc....it would a disater if this is what the pan and motion clips would look like.

Posted by  on  03/04  at  04:15 PM


Eero was asking about Outputting Standard Definition in FCP from the Sony XDCam EX1
Looks like Rick Young has figured out the ideal work flow:

http://www.kenstone.net/fcp_homepage/ex1_sd_output_young.html

Posted by  on  03/15  at  09:05 PM


Do the same HD tpo SD issues/workflows apply to other editing systems? For instance, Vegas?

Posted by  on  03/16  at  12:49 AM


I would like to thank Adam for his unstinting efforts to move Pro Video Camera reviewing out of the hands of the manufacturers.
They approach what I consider to be the current gold standard for reviews although they are for still cameras at http://www.dpreview.com/.
Thanks for all the effort.
If you’re ever in Atlanta I owe you I Belgian ale.
David Hudson

PS Now all we need are cracked case reviews so we can see what they’re really up to.

Posted by davhud  on  03/20  at  05:54 AM


Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

You must be registered to comment.

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below:




Advertisements
















Copyright 2008 ProVideo Coalition LLC