Ken Burns films, as well as those of his brother Ric, have led me to suggest, every time I see part of one, that the Association of Moving Image Archivists have an annual award dedicated to the least honorable use of archival footage. They’d own that award.
If you want to see how an historical documentary can be made working within the funding and other painful restraints of PBS, look no further than Eyes On The Prize. Those filmmakers (led by the late Henry Hampton) were scrupulously honest in their use of archival film. The event shown couldn’t just be “illustrative” of what was represented, it had to be footage of that actual event, shot that day—no faking. (Obviously there is no motion picture of the Civil War, I know that…)
The recent fascination with 16x9 has led the Burnses and others to reframe 4:3 material to fit the wide screen. While this is controversial in the case of generic old footage (why not pillarbox?) it reached a peak in Ric Burn’s film about Andy Warhol. Working from mediocre old transfers of some of Warhol’s films, Burns cropped them to 16x9. In doing this, he destroyed many of the complicated frames (and these were locked-down camera shots that may have lasted 33 minutes, so the frame was very intentional) because for some reason he felt that his compositional skills trumped Warhol’s.
Whatever you may think of Warhol (Drella is a good nickname) he was very specific in how he framed both films (these were earlier films where he was active in the shooting) and his art.
I won’t even bother with discussing the problems many historians have with Burns’ work—but they aren’t universally beloved.
Me, I only make films when I can be there when things are happening, and don’t believe in interviews, but if one is going to make historical films, Eyes on the Prize is inspirational. Burns’ work will teach you about fundraising and (self) promotion. Choose your inspirations carefully.
As for having a signed Burns baseball cap, really, that’s far more than we wanted to know about you, Bruce. Too much information!
Jeff Kreines
(OK, I’m a cranky cinema-verite purist out of the MIT Film Section, so there’s no way I’d ever appreciate Burns’ work. )
Posted by Jeff Kreines on 03/14 at 11:20 PM
Excellent article.Its really a good article. It gives me lots of pleasure and interest. It’s a most important post. So i want to know some other details about this article. Thanks
replacement car cd changer
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 08/24 at 12:33 AM
Hey you done a wonderful job. good writing style i got lots of information from them. thanks for sharing this nice post. keep it up and give us more information. nice to visit here. i will be coming soon.
audi a6 turbocharger
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 10/03 at 10:59 PM