Wow, that The Evoluent Vertical Wireless Mouse 3 looks like an interesting interface. I might put something like that right in front of the keyboard and not on the side.
very nice
Posted by Synaptic Light on 11/25 at 08:34 AM
Hoodman and Western Digital made the list?
um…those are the brands I tell people to avoid. And others back me up.
It kinda makes me question all the other recommendations, and wonder if I made a bad choice buying the Lexar UDMA reader.
...just sayin’
Posted by Bryan Fowler on 11/27 at 09:02 AM
Thanks for reading Bryan. What problems did you have with the Hoodman CF Cards and the Western Digital Drives?
Posted by Clint Milby on 11/27 at 06:09 PM
Hey Clint,
Thanks for the reply.
Well, the hoodman cards were fine, but they gave the same results as the Sandisk cards for 1/4 of the cost. I didn’t feel they were any more rugged than the the Sandisk cards, and had the same reed/write speed. (according to some website that tested them. With the 5Dmk2 we never got close to maxing either of them out.)—we’ve shot with them in the rain, heat, and cold.
I’m not saying Hoodman will fail, just that it’s 4 times the cost, for little to no benefit over other CF cards.
The Western Digital drives. I’ve just seen way, way to many of them fail, cause computers to crash or seriously slow down when plugged in, and just give poor performance overall.
It’s not worth it to me to save $30-50 but be nervous that the drive will fail because I moved it, or looked at it wrong. (maybe my look is more powerful than previously calculated.) =)
But that’s just my opinion of course. I know plenty of people that have done great stuff using WD drives. I don’t know anyone that uses Hoodman CF cards though. Maybe I need to meet more people.
Bryan
Posted by Bryan Fowler on 11/28 at 09:56 AM
Thanks for the info Bryan. I’m not following your logic. First, you say you wouldn’t buy the Hoodman CF Cards because they cost much more despite the fact that they ARE rated higher/faster than even the SanDisk Extreme Pro. The truth is the Hoodmans are less expensive than the Sandisk Extreme Pro. Here are some specs from both the Hoodman and the Sandisk websites:
*SanDisk Extreme® Pro CompactFlash® Card 90MB/s 16GB
$335.99
*Hoodman UDMA RAW COMPACT FLASH 100mb/s 16GB
$299.99
There is a slower option:
SanDisk Extreme® CompactFlash® Card 60MB/s 16GB
$246.99
*In the 8GB class, Sandisk doesn’t have an Extreme Pro, just the Extreme which is again only 60mb/second at $145.00
*The Hoodman 8GB shares the same specs as its big brother at 100MB/second. $179.00
I personal don’t like using anything larger than 8GB card. I think it’s risky to have so much footage on one disk. If it’s lost or damaged, the losses are that much greater with the larger cards, but that’s just me.
Now here’s where I’m getting lost. You say it’s ok to exercise frugality with regards to CF Cards, but when it comes to hard drives, money should be no object..? You continue to say that WD drives are risky, and one should spend more money to insure reliability. Of course we are probably all guilty of being inconsistent when it comes to purchases. Spending thousands on a camera body, but not spending a dime on lenses, or spending a fortune on editorial software but skimping on the workstation. However, I would have to say that if I had to make a choice, I’d be a bit more cautious in regards to my cards. I’ve shot on slow cheap cards, and I can tell you I’ve had some problems.
I can’t really speak to these issues your friends have with Western Digital. I can only share my experience. I’ve been using the WD drives for a couple of years, cutting directly from them using a USB 2.0 connection with an imac (windows partition) at my office and then using the same files on my HP work station at home. I have never once had any performance issues that were either directly or indirectly related to the drive. Of course, I could just be lucky. If my luck runs out, trust me, I’ll be the first one scream it from the mountain tops, but until that day comes, I would be amiss not share my experiences with you and our readers.
I don’t know about you, but if I’m buying a gift for someone, which again was the purpose of this article, and I was buying media cards, I would want to have the comfort of knowing that my gift didn’t fail them in the field. Therefore, in regards to the Compact Flash Cards, I’d give a Hoodman, and in regards to drives, I’d give a Western Digital.
*Prices sighted were from the following sources: http://www.hoodmanusa.com/products.asp?dept=1007
http://shop.sandisk.com/store/sdiskus/en_US/DisplayCategoryListPage/categoryID.11442500
Posted by Clint Milby on 11/28 at 07:21 PM
Hey Clint,
Thanks for the reply.
Let me approach it from a different angle, with headings for fun. =)
HOODMAN CARDS
I feel that the extra cost of the Hoodman doesn’t benefit me while I’m shooting video with my 5d. (If I was shooting stills, that might be different)
To my knowledge, the 5d recording video doesn’t come close to maxing out the 60MB/sec Sandisk Extreme card can handle. So the only time a 90MB/sec card would be nice is shooting high speed stills, or transferring.
So that’s why I don’t spend the extra money on Hoodman. I don’t shoot high speed stills, and my UDMA reader can’t do 90MB/sec anyway =) I don’t care if they are rated at 1TB/sec. if my 5D will only give the card 4MB/sec
I agree that Hoodman CF cards are a quality product. I sold mine because I didn’t need that much speed for video.
I’ve never had a Sandisk CF card fail. They perform wonderfully for me. My 4 32GB cards cost me $120 each from B&H
I sold my Hoodman CF card after not noticing any difference in the Hoodman vs Sandisk Extreme.
FRUGALITY
I don’t recall saying money should be no object. I did however say, “It’s not worth it to me to save $30-50 but be nervous that the drive will fail because I moved it, or looked at it wrong. “
WD DRIVES
Over the past 4 or 5 years, I’ve had 3 WD drives fail, 4 crash my computer when using eSata or FW. (These were all client’s drives)
Another Editor has similar stories. Once a client of his came in while I was there with a “dead drive” It was a 2 week old WD drive. Most of those same clients still have WD drives, and they have been working ok now.
I’ve had 12 Lacie drives, and 5 G-Tech drives, and one Caldigit raid. The others I still have. One Lacie failed after 7 years of use. I feel like that’s a good run.
SUMMATION
Again, those are just my opinions on CF cards and Drives. Those are the reasons I wouldn’t buy them for a friend, or request them as a gift. (well, I’d be ok with a Hoodman card, unless it meant I could have had three of another kind) I do feel that I’ve had a bit of experience with both of them.
Hopefully the magic of the internet won’t make me sound like I’m upset. I’m just wanting to share my experience.
In the end, nobody knows what CF card, hard drive, or underwear we use. They just watch our films…right? =)
Posted by Bryan Fowler on 11/28 at 09:16 PM
Bryan, if you know of a deal where I can get three cards off the same class for the price of one Hoodman, can you please link it here? That’s a deal I’d like to know about!
Again, the Hoodman 16gb is cheaper than the Sandisk Extreme Pro by $35. Maybe they were more expensive at the time you bought yours?
Of course you’re right, at the end of the day it’s about the painting and not the brush. However, this article is about brushes, and which ones would make a good gift.
“It kinda makes me question all the other recommendations…”
Beyond stating your opinions you raised questions about the integrity of the entire piece simply because I didn’t endorse brands you use. The price difference between Hoodman and the Sandisks is negligible. In the case of the 16GB class the Sandisk is more expensive. I’m sorry you’ve had issues with Western Digital, but despite your problems, which again are outside of my experiences, I stand by my endorsement. I hope you can respect my position in this matter and simply agree to disagree.
Posted by Clint Milby on 11/28 at 10:28 PM
You guys forgot the *best* gift of all… the Canon travel mugs! http://www.canonmugsshop.com/
Can’t afford that 70-200/2.8 L lens? Get ‘em the mug instead!
Posted by Christian Glawe on 12/03 at 01:56 PM
This vertical wireless mouse is so beautiful and interesting, its the first time I see it, I think I don’t even know how to use this.
Posted by Lista on 12/06 at 10:23 AM