As far as I understand, this product requires comprehensive logging and entering of large amounts of meta data, so the idea that it’s for lazy editors who can’t be bothered to log their footage is completely erroneous. I saw an interview with Philip Hodgetts (on http://www.macvideo.tv I think) where he said, if you’re making a documentary and he said “If you don’t log, you’re screwed in so many ways already, even if your not using this product.”
I doubt local news organisations would benefit from it as they rarely have time for proper logging and transcribing, it’s just in and out as quick as possible.
Posted by Dylan Pank on 09/05 at 05:13 AM
Amazing. I was thinking, just a couple of days ago, that most of my initial editing decisions are the same for each story I do, so why couldn’t it be dome with a piece of software? and here it is.
Posted by DanConklin on 09/05 at 09:44 AM
Hi Dylan,
I wouldn’t use the words “comprehensive logging”. First Cuts requires a certain level of minimum logging but I think it’s less than, or about the same as what a documentary editor would do anyway. That was part of our design goal. We figured that no-one would want to use it if First Cuts required more work than they were doing already. The need for even that minimal amount of work is why we target documentary filmmakers: they already do the logging and understand the benefit. We just make it even more valuable for them.
We’ve never claimed, nor would we, that First Cuts was a solution for lazy editors who don’t log. They’re mostly unemployed former editors if they work on documentaries 
Finisher will use all the log notes that First Cuts does, but for quick and easy projects, can use little or no metadata and still get a great result.
Cheers and thanks for the interest.
Philip Hodgetts
Co-developer First Cuts and Finisher for FCP
Posted by Philip Hodgetts on 09/05 at 06:20 PM