<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
    xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
    xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

    <channel>
    
    <title>PVC | Capria TV</title>
    <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria</link>
    <description></description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <dc:creator>frank@capria.tv</dc:creator>
    <dc:rights>Copyright 2008</dc:rights>
    <dc:date>2008-03-25T20:21:00-08:00</dc:date>
    <admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://expressionengine.com/" />
    

    <item>
      <title>If an HDTV Falls in the Woods&#8230;</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/if_an_hdtv_falls_in_the_woods/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/if_an_hdtv_falls_in_the_woods/#When:20:21:00Z</guid>
      <description>ABI Research released some highlights of its recent research on HDTV adoption and the viewing habits of Americans. While 41% of Americans have HDTV&#8217;s, only about half of those HDTV receive any sort of an HD signal. While it might not be too surprising that only one out of Americans can view HDTV in all its glory, it&#8217;s shocking that another one out of five think they are watching HD when they are just watching a blown up SD image. 


Lay the blame at the feet of the cable companies. I&#8217;ve been to several living rooms where what&#8217;s sold as HD looks indistinguishable from an up&#45;converted standard definition DVD. This isn&#8217;t something I want  to be pondering at 2:00 AM as we&#8217;re perfecting the look of my next HD production.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Business, Distribution</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-25T20:21:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>In Defense of &#8220;Fanboys&#8221;.</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/in_defense_of_fanboys/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/in_defense_of_fanboys/#When:13:58:00Z</guid>
      <description>Any journalist who has ever written anything even slightly critical of Apple has suffered the wrath of the small, but vocal Apple zealotry. The same goes for the Red camera. In days gone by Media 100 users could get quite agitated as well. Among my colleagues it&#8217;s a running joke. If you want to boost your numbers, criticize Apple or Red. Today&#8217;s Boston Globe featured an interesting blurb on the phenomenon. Farhad Manjoo has released some excerpts of his forthcoming book, True Enough.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-24T13:58:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Red to Avid Workflow Utility</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/red_to_avid_workflow_utility/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/red_to_avid_workflow_utility/#When:18:09:00Z</guid>
      <description>Rainer Standke, longtime participant on the FCP&#45;L and Avid&#45;L2 mailing lists, editor, and software developer, has released XMiL Sequencer. This handy utility allows editors to import file&#45;based camera originals, such as QuickTime movies created from Red&#8217;s R3D files, into Avid environments while preserving all necessary metadata.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Editing, Post Production</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-21T18:09:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>The Future of Advertising and Non&#45;Fiction Television</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/the_future_of_advertising_and_non_fiction_television/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/the_future_of_advertising_and_non_fiction_television/#When:00:54:00Z</guid>
      <description>Anyone making a living in video would do well to read this special report on the future of advertising by the Project for Excellence in Journalism. It succinctly explains how television advertising rates continue to rise even as viewership declines dramatically. Even before the writers strike threw an anvil to an industry trying to tread water, the numbers were telling:

For the first 11 weeks of the 2007&#45;08 television season, prior to the effects of the fall 2007 Writers Guild of America strike, Nielsen data show viewer declines for the crucial 18&#45;to&#45;49 age group of 19.4% for NBC, 16.7% for CBS, 10.5% for ABC and 28.6% for CW. Only Fox improved, with a 3.4% gain.

The trend is clear. Broadcast television is fading. Audiences are gathering information and getting entertained elsewhere. With broadband penetration now over 50% in the US, web video may be at a long&#45;awaited inflection point.</description>
      <dc:subject>Business, Distribution</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-21T00:54:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>What Avid&#8217;s Moves Mean</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/what_avids_moves_mean/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/what_avids_moves_mean/#When:16:19:00Z</guid>
      <description>Avid&#8217;s finally taken the action many have been calling for. It&#8217;s decided to simplify its product line, dropping Xpress Pro and lowering the price of Media Composer. Details here.


The consensus in various forums and mailing lists is that this is another example of too little, too late from Avid. I respectfully dissent. Too late? Only time will tell. Back in May 2006 I suggested it was time to put Xpress Pro out to pasture to gasps from Avid marketing types in the audience. Too little? That&#8217;s harder to say. By maintaining its distance from Final Cut Pro in terms of pricing, Avid is saying that it doesn&#8217;t compete on price with Final Cut Pro. Now Avid has to articulate its justification for that strategy.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-17T16:19:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Emerging Mobile Trends</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/emerging_mobile_trends/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/emerging_mobile_trends/#When:11:14:01Z</guid>
      <description>A Pew Internet and American Life Project survey on mobile and wireless usage contains few surprises. Traditional television&#8217;s importance to the average American is diminishing while dependency on mobile phones and internet access grows. For the first time, a majority of Americans with mobile phones said the devices would be very hard to give up, yet only 43% said television would be hard to give up.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Business</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-03-07T11:14:01-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>New Content, Better Model</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/new_content_better_model/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/new_content_better_model/#When:19:53:00Z</guid>
      <description>The Disney&#45;ABC Television Group announced the launch of Stage 9 Digital Media yesterday. Stage 9&#8217;s mission is to bridge the gap between user&#45;generated content and broadcast network programming. (I thought that&#8217;s what Fox does.) Still, there&#8217;s quite a space between cats using the toilet and Scrubs. First out of the gate is &#8220;Squeegees,&#8221; a series exclusively distributed on YouTube. 


The formula might work. &#8220;Squeegees&#8221; does have higher production values than most anything else featured on YouTube. Its lower production costs allow for more experimentation, and its web presence allows for instantaneous data measurements of audience size, length of visit, and click&#45;through. Networks now have the means to get more young talent in pipelines.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-02-29T19:53:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>New Model, Same Content</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/new_model_same_content/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/new_model_same_content/#When:13:29:00Z</guid>
      <description>Quarterlife is a series about those people you couldn&#8217;t stand in college and didn&#8217;t care what happened to them afterwards. As Friends proved, that can be a successful formula. What makes Quarterlife interesting is that the series, originally rejected by ABC, began its life on the web. What makes it really interesting is that it wasn&#8217;t terribly successful&#8212;many episodes drew only 100,000 or so viewers.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject>Business, Distribution</dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-02-27T13:29:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>Apple: Let ProRes Go Pro</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/prores_wish_list/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/prores_wish_list/#When:23:00:00Z</guid>
      <description>Apple&#8217;s ProRes codec is great, boasting great images and manageable files sizes, but its wider adoption is hampered by its proprietary distribution model. When Apple got into the editing business at the turn of the century it was a very different company. Avid had threatened to abandon the Mac platform, and Apple wanted to continue selling high end workstations to the professional video market. Few dared to imagine that Final Cut Pro would eventually challenge Avid as the dominant professional NLE. 


While I&#8217;ve been quite pleased using ProRes 422 as an editing codec, I&#8217;ve been hampered in adopting it in a wider range of tasks. Visually, ProRes compares well to Avid&#8217;s DNxHD family of codecs, but unlike DNxHD ProRes is Mac&#45;only. I can&#8217;t send a ProRes encoded QuickTime file to a PC for encoding, as a source for After Effects work, or import into an Avid or Premiere Pro system. Because Avid&#8217;s DNxHD is cross&#45;platform, and Avid has a track record of supporting legacy codecs in later revisions, I have used all manner of Avid codecs for archiving purposes.</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-02-25T23:00:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    <item>
      <title>2009 Could Be Big Year for Independents</title>
      <link>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/2009_will_be_big_year_for_independents/</link>
      <guid>http://provideocoalition.com/index.php/fcapria/2009_will_be_big_year_for_independents/#When:15:48:00Z</guid>
      <description>Last week Harris released the results of its survey of broadcasters making the switch to DTV. U.S. broadcasters said they expect to meet the FCC&#45;mandated Feb. 17, 2009 deadline. That frees up a whole lot of spectrum&#8212;60 MHz in the 700 MHz band&#8212;with companies like Apple and Google, gobs of cash in hand, to grab a chunk once it hits the auction block. 


This is the kind of stuff that usually flies under my radar, but it got me thinking. Should Google, Apple, or even Micro&#45;hoo! opt to build a nationwide WiFi network, opportunities for independent video distribution will abound. Devices like the iPod Touch will make mobile video a reality as 3G operators like AT&amp;amp;T, Sprint, and Verizon cling to outdated broadcast models for mobile video distribution.&amp;nbsp;</description>
      <dc:subject></dc:subject>
      <dc:date>2008-02-25T15:48:00-08:00</dc:date>
    </item>

    
    </channel>
</rss>