(Page 2 of 2 pages for this article  <  1 2)

Filed under: Pre-Production •Production •Visual Effects •

Online Post-Production Management with ShotRunner

One thing that is particular complicated about visual effects production is how assets such as 3D models and matte paintings might be created and revised independent of several shots in which they might appear. ShotRunner makes it simple to list assets and attach them to given shots so that anyone working on an associated shot can also access information about what elements are available, and the current status of those elements.

Likewise, either a shot or an element will have individual tasks which might be assigned to specific artists. This is ShotRunner at the most granular level, where it becomes a to-do list for an individual which a supervisor can also look in on to assess progress.

A ShotRunner account includes upload capacity for review files. On the project shown in these examples we kept a separate SFTP server for moving big data, which also had to travel around on big drives. Although it is not yet practical to use ShotRunner for file management, that feature set is currently being redone according to the product manager, Cameron O’Rourke. It will reportedly utilize a shared file system using secure cloud storage (which he is careful to emphasize will not use the Amazon S3 system). Says Cameron, “Every project and vendor will be completely firewalled off for security. This will open the door to folks using ShotRunner as their primary file storage for projects, and later on we’ll be integrating Aspera to provide fast and reliable file transfers and sync.”

There’s no option to install ShotRunner locally to your own server; instead, the application is intended to be low-cost, which is better served by basing it from a central server (which doesn’t require the support and infrastructure of a local installation). Now being rolled into ShotRunner is a Python API, allowing clever technical people using tools that have a Python component to add batch processing or even incorporate the use of Microsoft Project.

If ShotRunner is aimed at small and independent production, Shotgun is designed predominantly for large studios, many of which have adopted it. Producers and production coordinators get access to gantt charts and many other project management and scheduling tools – but at a cost that is at a high premium to ShotRunner (roughly 10x). For large shows it avoids being stuck with a generalized tool like Microsoft Project.

Supervisors on the art/post-production side, on the other hand, tend to have a certain allergy to this granular type of project management, and on smaller projects it’s hardly worth the trouble, provided everyone understands their deadlines. The projects I brought to ShotRunner each had a couple dozen individual effects shots shared by half a dozen or so artists, and so for my uses the software was just right: not requiring me to enter more data than I needed, but flexible enough that I could manage a team whose members included artists on the other side of the country, or on another continent.

What would I have done without ShotRunner in these cases? I would certainly have spent a lot more time emailing back and forth with individual artists and attempting to use a normal to-do list with some project containing clips and the latest takes of shots. The greatest advantage offered by ShotRunner has been peace of mind, being able at a glance to know where everything related to a project is at, and knowing that my team members have access to the same information. We artists are not generally fond of bar charts, and yet the satisfaction that comes watching a project progress toward completion as measured by shot status – now that’s worthwhile.

Pricing and other information about ShotRunner can be found here.

(Page 2 of 2 pages for this article  <  1 2)

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: