(Page 2 of 2 pages for this article  <  1 2)

Filed under: Hardware •

AppleTV Take 2: New Software, Same Hardware

The maximum resolution for video content is 1280x720. That’s 720p, right? That’s HD, right?

Well…barely. All the movies you’d buy in HD on Blu-ray or HD DVD are 1080p - that’s 1920x1080. And since all movies are 24p, the whole 60p vs 60i argument is moot - 1080p knocks blisters into 720p - it is 2.25 times as many pixels, so more than TWICE the resolution of 720p. Yep - that means HD DVD and Blu-ray (and HD DVR usually) should be twice as sharp as AppleTV content.

Next part of the HDTV picture - frame rate. AppleTV can do 720p. The broadcast spec for 720p is 60 fps (frames per second). Surprise! AppleTV is rated for a maximum of 24fps at 720p resolution - so it can’t do broadcast frame rates.

Egads, that’s bad. So what can it do?

If you want to run higher than 24 fps, it has to drop resolution lower. The maximum frame rate it can do is 30fps for H.264 encoded video (we’ll come back to codecs) at 960x540. So that’s only 1/4 of the number of pixels of true 1080p. Lame.

And as far as framerate goes, that is STILL half the temporal resolution of eithe of the HD resolutions - 720p is 60 progressive frames per second, and 1080i is 60 fields (half frames, every other horizontal line) per second.

For starters, this means that if Apple wants to sell you any broadcast TV show that was aired or produced at 60i or 60p, they have to cut the resolution to 1/4 the original pixels, the cut the framerate in half….so you’re getting 1/8 as much information as you coulda/shoulda. Not so spiffy.

Last year, when Blu-ray and HD DVD players were selling for $600 and up, AppleTV’s position make some financial sense. This year, with HD DVD as a format going down fast * with half of one wing left and both engines aflame, chucking players overboard at $100 a pop at WalMart…that’s not hugely compelling anymore. Blu-ray players are dropping fast too - as low as $310 (just checked Amazon)...Apple doesn’t compete there.

And then there is the datarate - all three (HD DVD, Blu-ray, and AppleTV) can use the highly efficient H.264 codec. IF my VERY quick and dirty Google based research is right, here’s the maximum datarate for combined audio and video:

Blu-ray: 54 megabits/sec (40 of it video max) at 1080 resolution

HD DVD: 36.55 megabits/sec (30 of it video max) at 1080 resolution

AppleTV: 5 megabits/sec for 720p content

Eww. Umm…yeah. That.

You can see the crunchiness of AppleTV HD encoded content more than you can in HD DVD and Blu-ray content, and it isn’t a surprise why, when you can have up to eight times the datarate available. So AppleTV pictures look crunchier than Blu-ray and HD DVD…and they always will unless the datarate limitation changes substantially…which I doubt, since the GPU and CPU of the AppleTV aren’t terribly high powered.

Then there is the issue of formats - AppleTV ONLY supports H.264 files, and only within the above constraints, and only openly encoded files or Apple Fairplay DRM encoded files (and only files your particular machine is authorized to play, at that!) No Flash, no MPEG-2 from a DVD. No Amazon Unbox or anybody else’s downloadable DRM’d movies, either. Hmm.

The interesting question is to see whether the market for video content (movies & TV shows anyway) will follow audio’s path - will fast and low quality beat slow and high quality?

The next question is that of content - Apple’s new rental agreements means there will be a (claimed) total of 1000 movies available for rent. That probably exceeds the number of titles available on HD DVD and Blu-ray (I have NOT done my research on that attribute, basing that on walking the shelves at Fry’s today - so somebody bust me with accurate numbers if you have them! It is 4am as I write this…)

All this said, however, I think the rental model will give Apple a push with AppleTV, Big Time. While Blu-ray and HD DVD deliver a vastly superior picture, and XBox360 downloads are superior in quality, and Amazon Unbox is a product of Amazon…Apple being Apple (with their marketing skill, clout, and 18 billion in cash and no debt) will rule the roost of digital downloads this year and probably for a few more. Of course, that may be King Poop of Dukey Mountain in comparison to DVD sales and rentals this year, but what about in 5 years? Apple is the only player (so to speak) in this market that can deliver a digital file over the Internet that will play on Mac, PC, set top box (Apple’s own AppleTV), iPod and iPhone (although regretably not all at same time). Nobody else can come close to that, with the marketing muscle to not only promote it heavily and nationally but also the muscle to get ALL the major studios to agree to make their content available.

And that alone will make Apple the winner in this field.

Suddenly, I don’t feel so bad about Apple’s stock plunging from 200 to 130 over the space of a few weeks.

Apple’s real competitors, at this point in time, are Blu-ray, Netflix, Amazon, and pay-per-view.

Blu-ray offers vastly superior quality, but if Apple’s plans hold, Blu-ray won’t have as much rentable content available (through Netflix, for instance). But you have to go to the store to buy/rent, or wait for Netflix to deliver.

Netflix offers a huge library of DVDs, Blu-ray and HD DVD movies with a 2 day delay. iTunes has a more limited library, but faster access.

XBox 360 movies? Nobody knows about it, too little content, and Microsoft isn’t pushing it hard enough nor getting enough press about it. Too bad for them, the picture quality is superior.

I see the real competitor to Apple in this space is Pay-Per-View. Content is limited but trendy and up-to-the-minute. The audio/video quality is better, the access is even faster than iTunes, the cost is higher (pay for what you get), and, significantly, millions of set top boxes already offer this feature.

I’d never, ever utilized the HD pay-per-view service until the past month or so, to watch Next, Hostel Part 2 and other late night, I’m-bored-and-want-junk disposable movies. Perhaps it was the iTunes rental model that legitimized in my own mind, I don’t know.

The interesting thing will be in a week (or two) when I can update my existing AppleTV and have the choice between them - which will I pick?

-mike

* After recently upgrading my laptop, the old drive is heading for the AppleTV, once the new software is out and somebody publishes a How To on the software shenanigans involved in…oh man, I don’t even want to describe the general steps. Suffice it say, if the girlfriend’s away for a full day some weekend, that’s what it’ll take….or several evenings of watching TV with computer guts and a laptop in front of me…like I have that kind of spare time on my hands right now…digress digress digress. And by the way, this and the Macbook Air might both seem to read as “How does this product blow? Let me count the ways….” articles. I’m not going to be all negative on this sight, these were just topics I wanted to discuss, so they ended up here. Fret not - I’ll hae plenty of effusive Apple praise soon enough, I’m sure - I still loves me my iPhone, Macbook, and Mac Pro, don’t you worry…

** ...and the HD DVD group is spending $2.7 million for a SuperBowl ad whilst the format crumbles in both studio and consumer favor - “Burn, Rome, burn! Yeeeeehaaaaaaaa!!!!!!”

OK, one more tidbit to think on - once the rental market is up and going…how do we hook into iTunes to do rental indie content, or pay-per-view podcasts and indie movies, etc.? How do indies get their content in there?

(Page 2 of 2 pages for this article  <  1 2)

btw, too little content on Xbox Live?  Have you looked?  They’ve got way more content than anybody, with the possible exception of apple now.

the only problem xbox live has is the same problem apple has, the price and drm restrictions are too high.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  02/19  at  03:05 PM

---

I’m assuming most content, narrative at least, is acquired at 24fps.

The question becomes whether networks and other content producers/owners are set up to deliver progressive versions of their shows to Apple, so it’s not wasting bandwidth or dropping res because of unnecessary duplicated frames.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  02/27  at  11:22 AM

---

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: