It baffles me.. who does this? IOx the offending part and trim into the new cut, or rather if you need to trim two parts, then slide the middle and M<>/ the center clip. 0 to 2 clicks while commanding jkl realtime control. The rest is quick clacks on keyboard, snap your preview key and poof, done in seconds.
Do people really spend that much time mousing, thinking about where that cursor has to be, rather than the cut?
That is why FCP is annoying, because it doesn’t let you go keyboard nuts at lightning speed. (The only reason why TBH.. otherwise it’s awesome) (Except the part where everyone puts media everywhere and then moves drives around WITH THE MEDIA, because they didn’t remember where it was being saved.. haha.. yea. )
-P
Posted by praxisseizure on 07/20 at 12:01 AM
Though to be fair to the article, I’ve not tried it yet. If it helps working with audio rubber bands, then I’ll be delighted. I normally default to H\ click > length/center > num-pad clackity to make audio tweaks because the audio rubberbands are kind of lame. Later using pro-tools to deal with that anyway though.
We’ll see, its on my purchase list next month.
Posted by praxisseizure on 07/20 at 12:41 AM
“It baffles me.. who does this?”
praxisseizure, are you talking about moving the non-adjacent clips in the timeline via segment mode? I think there’s a lot of reasons to do this but I have to agree that Avid lets you be much more keyboard driven overall and that’s a good thing as you can work faster. Faster is better!
Posted by Scott Simmons on 07/20 at 09:03 AM
Hey, thanks for this over view - I haven’t worked on and Avid for some time now - but I believe it vital to stay current and thorough reviews such as this will minimize the “cramming” I might need do should I find myself in a position to be working with this tool in the future.
Regarding speed in editing - I would hope all editors would keep the pressure on the software writers of whatever tool they use - to debug and streamline their code so that it “just works” “fast” with whatever hardware or OS or file format and codec. New features are great - but - performance is everything. I think most editors - once they decide “how” they want to cut something - can do it relative fast with any “tool” - what takes up all the time is the amount of seconds - to even minutes that it takes the hardware to respond to those decisions or experiments - What takes up all the time is the rendering and the transcoding of files to behave nicely on the timeline and what not. Not the button pressing.
Posted by Jim Hines on 07/21 at 09:52 AM
I’ve used Avid since the last time they released a version 5 in and around 1994. AMA and the ability to mix formats and frame rates has been an incredible blessing to my editing workflows, Right now I’m mixing 24f Canon, 30f Canon, 24p XDCAM and 60i standard def on a storytelling project. In real time!!
But, so far I’ve kept the smart tool off,,I plan on playing with it more later. I understand the basic segment and replace functions because they’re not new, but the smart trimming without trim mode I’m a little uneasy about.
I can see versioning in a supervised edit where it might speed things up for reordering whole sections maybe, but i’m not sure it will change me from entering trim mode. I’m an old dog!!!
I agree with Scott that the more precise you are on first version edits, the more flexibility you have on the back end content adjustments. I still believe basic 3-point editing and building a sequence with precision from the get go works better than throwing a bunch of non subclipped clips around in the early stages of an edit. A writer on deadline, doesn’t take random sentences and words and throw them up in the air to see where they land. IMHO, video editing is not much different than writing.
Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 07/21 at 10:09 AM