This program would have been excellent were it not for the misguided decision to have it hosted by a “dope”. I don’t know why producers or networks feel they need to “jazz” up an already compelling subject but I took a shower to wash off the big time, Hollywood TV production stink after watching this show. 10% of the entire program was worth the watch and 90% was E Entertainment style editing and ridiculous, corn pone shenanigans. Just point the camera at the people who developed the technology and let the science be the magic that keeps people tuned in. It would seem to me that anyone watching the science channel is seeking out an academic experience and not a night out with Howie Mandel.

I would watch this show regularly if they change up the format and respect their audience. Geek is not synonymous with douche bag.

Posted by Jim Hines  on  05/27  at  04:00 AM

---

I agree with you a bit on that Jim, though I did like the show a bit better. I was kind of 50/50 on the host. He seemed too over the top but I bet that was at the urging of the show’s producers. You are right in that they try their damnedest these days to make this kind of stuff feel like MTV Cribs and place the emphasis on style over substance.

Posted by Scott Simmons  on  05/27  at  08:40 AM

---

I just reread my post. Maybe I should have counted to ten before posting. It was a little strong. I think the concept is a great idea. I’m positive the guy hosting was just doing what they hired him to do. I only wish the producers would take a more informative approach and trust that the subject matter itself will hold the viewers attention.

P.S. I also neglected to thank you for bringing this program to my attention in the first place. So, sincerely, thank you for the tip off and please keep ‘em coming : - )

Posted by Jim Hines  on  05/27  at  09:39 AM

---

I’m a Behind the Scenes freak and a Movie Science geek. Anything that explains how movies are made, from the magic of Hollywood to the innovations of the garage-effects producer, I’ll watch.

I found this post today and was disappointed to see that I missed the show’s debut by one day. I hope it continues, but as I read these blog comments, I’m wondering if Hollywood once again blew it by trying to give the audience what the producers or bean-counters think they want, instead of what the audience really wants. Yes, someone who tunes into the Science Channel is probably going to be OK with straight-ahead editing and commentary. Too bad they don’t “get” this type of audience.

Posted by VideoChick  on  05/27  at  11:53 AM

---

How do I find out what channel the science channel is on?
I need to know the channel number, i have comcast in pittsburgh.
Fire Science

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address)  on  09/13  at  10:05 PM

---

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Smileys

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?

Submit the word you see below: